aortic valvular stenosis (AS)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]
Classification
- mild:
- mean transvalvular pressure gradient < 25 mm Hg
- Vmax across aortic valve < 3 m/sec
- aortic valve area > 1.5 cm2
- moderate
- mean transvalvular pressure gradient 25-40 mm Hg
- Vmax across aortic valve 3-4 m/sec
- aortic valve area 1.0-1.5 cm2
- severe
- mean transvalvular pressure gradient > 40 mm Hg
- Vmax across aortic valve > 4 m/sec
- aortic valve area < 1.0 cm2
Etiology
- atherosclerosis
- calcification & degeneration of a normal valve
- most common cause of aortic stenosis in adults > 55 years
- congenitally bicuspid aortic valve
- calcification & fibrosis
- 1% of population
- most common cause of aortic stenosis in adults < 55 years
- ejection click often precedes murmur
- rheumatic valvular disease
- uncommon cause
- generally occurs 40-60 years of age
- rheumatoid arthritis increases risk[35]
- bacterial endocarditis
Epidemiology
- most patients present in 5th-7th decade of life
- 2.8% of elderly (> 75 years)
Pathology
- high pressure gradient from left ventricle to aorta
- concentric hypertrophy of left ventricle
- reduced left ventricular compliance
- increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure
- increased myocardial oxygen demand
- increased left ventricle wall stress
- decreased perfusion pressure across myocardium
- subendocardial ischemia
- infective endocarditis may complicate aortic stenosis
- disruption of HMW vWF multimers may occur
- secondary von Willebrand's disease may occur[19]
- deficiency of von Willebrand factor is directly related to the severity of aortic stenosis as assessed by the transvalvular pressure gradient[4]
Genetics
- associated with defects in Notch1
- genetic risk factors for elevated LDL cholesterol associated with aortic valve calcification & aortic valvular stenosis[14]
Clinical manifestations
- symptoms:
- may be asymptomatic
- exertional angina (more common presenting symptom in younger patients)
- exertional syncope (more common presenting symptom in younger patients)
- heart failure (more common presenting symptom in older patients)
- exertional dyspnea
- signs:
- slowly rising & diminished carotid pulse that is sustained (pulsus parvus, pulsus tardus)
- sign may be absent in elderly patients
- systolic murmur
- mid to late peaking (crescendo-decrescendo)
- usually harsh in nature
- may be softer in elderly
- intensity of murmur may decrease as stenosis increases in severity & cardiac output diminishes
- duration or length of murmur increases with severity
- Valsalva maneuver diminishes the intensity of the murmur
- murmur heard best at right upper sternal border[4]
- may be heard best at apex in the elderly as a high-pitched, musical sound (Gallavarian's phenomenon)
- radiation of murmur to right clavicle, carotid artery
- with severe aortic valvular stenosis, murmur may radiate down the descending thoracic aorta[4]
- murmur may increase with decreased heart rate
- murmur is mid-systolic at upper sternal region[4]
- systolic thrill at base
- diminished A2 with severe aortic valvular stenosis (AS)
- weak & delayed carotid upstroke with severe AS
- accentuated precordial thrust at apex
- enlarged, nondisplaced & sustained apical impulse[4]
- paradoxical splitting of 2nd heart sound (S2) or absence of A2 &/or S2 with severe aortic stenosis
- absence of A2 more common in elderly
- S4 gallop due to atrial contraction into a noncompliant ventricle
- non-calcified bicuspid aortic valve will have ejection click followed by systolic murmur[4]
- slowly rising & diminished carotid pulse that is sustained (pulsus parvus, pulsus tardus)
Laboratory
- troponin-I in serum/plasma may be elevated with severe aortic stenosis due to left ventricular wall stress & myocardial ischemia[39][40]
Diagnostic procedures
- electrocardiogram
- tall R waves
- ST segment depression & inverted T-waves
- left bundle branch block is common due to calcification of interventricular septum
- Q waves suggest coexistent coronary artery disease (CAD)
- left ventricular hypertrophy
- often normal in young patients
- echocardiogram (Doppler)
- aortic valve pressure gradient
- > 50 mm Hg (mean) or > 80 mm Hg (peak) in severe AS
- average annual increase of 8.3 mm Hg (peak) & 6.3 (mean) mm Hg in severe AS
- coexisting aortic regurgitation results in over-estimation of aortic valve gradient by doppler
- underestimation of transvalvular gradient with LV dysfunction[4]
- aortic gradient predicts prognosis better than estimated valve area[38]
- aortic value area (normal 3-4 cm2)
- 1.5-2 cm2: mild
- 1-1.5 cm2: moderate
- aortic valve pressure gradient
- < 1 cm2: severe
- peak aortic velocity (Vmax = 2-6 m/sec)
- calcified aortic valve leaflets
- left atrial enlargement common
- left ventricular hypertrophy
- restricted wall motion
- frequency of serial evaluation
- every 3-5 years
- every 1-2 years
- every 6-12 months every 6-12 months
- asymtomatic severe AS preserved LVEF[4]
- aortic valve replacement not necessary
- aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients
- dobutamine echocardiography for low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis due to LV systolic dysfunction (low LVEF)[4]
- exercise testing
- not routinely indicated[4]
- reasonable in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis[34]
- consider prior to or in lieu of angiography
- contraindicated in patients with severe aortic stenosis[24]
- apparently not contraindicated[34]
- perform under carefully controlled conditions
- avoid in symptomatic patients[4]
- hypotensive response identifies candidates for immediate aortic valve replacement[4]
- resting & exercise serum BNP (asymptomatic, severe AS)
- angiography (cardiac catheterization)*
- all patients > 35 years of age for whom surgical intervention is considered[4]
- right & left heart catheterization if echocardiogram fails to define severity of diagnosis or if clinical findings differ from those of echocardiogram & patient is candidate for intervention
- identifies transvalvular gradient in the presence of LV dysfunction
- as needed to identify coronary artery disease (CAD)
- severe aortic stenosis with worsening symptoms[8]
* CT angiography or magnetic resonance angiography if bicuspid aortic valve & aortic root & ascending aorta not adequately visualized with echocardiography[4]
Radiology
- chest X-ray
- calcification of aortic valve ring
- enlargement of left ventricle
- prominent ascending aorta
- aortic root may show post-stenotic dilatation
- boot-shaped cardiac silhouette[4]
- computed tomography measurement of valve calcification
- useful for patients with discordant aortic valve area with aortic valve gradient[11]
- CT angiography or magnetic resonance angiography if bicuspid aortic valve & aortic root & ascending aorta not adequately visualized with echocardiography[4]
Complications
- Heyde syndrome in patients with gastrointestinal angioectasias[4]
- patients with LV systolic dysfunction are at high risk for hospitalization for heart failure, death, or need for aortic valve replacement[21]
- exertional syncope
- myocardial fibrosis detected by cardiac magnetic resonance is associated with late mortality[28]
- 5-year mortality rates for patients with mild, moderate,& severe AS is 34%, 43%, & 53%, respectively[30]
- acquired von Willebrand syndrome
- loss of HMW vWF multimers compromising platelet function
- measure HMW vWF multimers
- see Pathology: (above)
- loss of HMW vWF multimers compromising platelet function
Differential diagnosis
- aortic sclerosis
- no diminished A2
- no diminished carotid pulses
- mitral regurgitation (holosystolic murmur at apex)
- pulmonic stenosis (ejection murmur loudest at left sternal border)
- hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
- aortic pseudostenosis[4]
- low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis due to LV systolic dysfunction
- dobutamine echocardiography distinguishes[4]
- low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis due to LV systolic dysfunction
Management
Medical management
- cardiovascular risk modification for elderly with degenerative-calcific aortic stenosis
- restriction of physical activity
- arrhythmias poorly tolerated; treat aggressively
- heart failure associated with AS
- digoxin may be of benefit if left ventricular dilatation
- diuretics
- may be useful in treating congestive symptoms
- reduction of left ventricular filling pressure may decrease cardiac output & systemic blood pressure
- use with caution
- ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (recommended)[4]
- avoid nitrates & other vasodilators
- reduction of left ventricular filling pressure
- decrease cardiac output & systemic blood pressure
- hemodynamic collapse
- use beta-blockers cautiously only for angina
- angina
- nitroglycerin
- hypotension from nitroglycerin
- use beta-blockers cautiously
- coronary angiography if surgical candidate[8]
- stress testing can precipitate symptoms & heart failure
- CPR unlikely to be sucessful; chest compressions generally insufficient to open stenotic aortic valve
- asymptomatic patients
- clinical evaluation annually
- optimal blood pressure unclear
- systolic BP < 120 mm Hg, diastolic BP > 90 mm Hg, & pulse pressure < 50 mm Hg associated with higher all-cause mortality[20]
- average systolic BP 130-160 mm Hg associated with lowest all-cause mortality[20]
- echocardiogram (see classification above)
- mild: every 3-5 years
- moderate: every 1-2 years
- severe: yearly
- onset of symptoms associated with expected survival of 2-3 years without surgical intervention[4]
- referral to cardiology for severe aortic stenosis
- antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis
- rosuvastatin does not slow progression of aortic stenosis[10]
Surgery
- aortic valve replacement (AVR) indicated in
- symptomatic patients
- patients with LV dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) or hypotension on exercise stress testing[4]
- rapid progression of aortic stenosis
- mean aortic value pressure gradient > 60 mm Hg[4]
- moderate or severe AS during cardiac surgery for other reason (CABG)[4]
- asymptomatic patients with severe AS
- class IIa recommendation for very severe AS[4]
- not indicated if preserved LVEF[4]
- prognosis without aortic valve replacement is poor[18]
- hospitalizations for heart failure & death lower with AVR in patients with asymptomatic severe AS[33]
- aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedures
- Ross procedure - pulmonic valve autograft
- self-expanding, percutaneous aortic valve prosthesis[6] (transcatheter aortic valve implantation, TAVI)
- indicated for patients with high surgical risk[4]
- tricuspid aortic valves only[4]
- symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis
- patients without severe aortic regurgitation[4]
- similar 1-year outcomes with TAVR in bicuspid & tricuspid aortic valves[29]
- intraaortic balloon counterpulsation may stabilize patients with critical aortic stenosis until surgery for AVR
- percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty reserved for
- congenital AS
- patients for which surgery is not an option
- 20% complication rate
- high incidence of restenosis
- not for adults with calcific AS[4]
- non cardiac surgery
- extensive preoperative testing unncessary in asymptomatic patients[4]
- intraoperative & postoperative hemodynamic monitoring[4]
- aortic valve replacement when indicated prior to elective non-cardiac surgery[36]
Follow-up
- echocardiogram to assess aortic valve area[4]
* higher mortality & hospitalization for heart failure & lower rates of aortic valve replacement (19% vs 54%) for nonadherent patients[25]
More general terms
More specific terms
Additional terms
- aortic subvalvular stenosis
- aortic supravalvular stenosis
- aortic valve
- aortic valve replacement (AVR)
References
- ↑ Manual of Medical Therapeutics, 28th ed, Ewald & McKenzie (eds), Little, Brown & Co, Boston, 1995, pg 126-28
- ↑ DeGowin & DeGowin's Diagnostic Examination, 6th edition, RL DeGowin (ed), McGraw Hill, NY 1994, pg 866
- ↑ Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 40-41
- ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 4.24 4.25 4.26 4.27 4.28 4.29 4.30 4.31 4.32 4.33 4.34 4.35 4.36 4.37 4.38 4.39 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998, 2006, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2022.
- ↑ Nkomo VT et al, Burden of valvular heart diseases: A population-based study. Lancet 2006, 368:1005 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16980116
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Grube E et al, Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: The Spieburg First-in-Man Study. Circulation 2006, 114:1616 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17015786
- ↑ Wilson W et al, Prevention of infective endocardititis: guidelines from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease Committe, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. J AM Dent Assoc 2008, 139:3S PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18167394
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 7th edition Parada JT et al (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2010
Geriatric Review Syllabus, 8th edition (GRS8) Durso SC and Sullivan GN (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2013
Geriatric Review Syllabus, 11th edition (GRS11) Harper GM, Lyons WL, Potter JF (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2022 - ↑ Iung B. Management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Heart. 2011 Feb;97(3):253-9 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21189311
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Chan KL, Teo K, Dumesnil JG et al; ASTRONOMER Investigators. Effect of Lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis: results of the aortic stenosis progression observation: measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):306-14 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20048204
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Clavel M-A et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: New insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013 Dec; 62:2329. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076528
Dweck MR et al. Small valve area with low-gradient aortic stenosis: Beware the hard hearted. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076527 - ↑ Nathaniel S, Saligram S, Innasimuthu AL Aortic stenosis: An update. World J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 26;2(6):135-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21160731
- ↑ Otto CM and Prendergast B Aortic-Valve Stenosis - From Patients at Risk to Severe Valve Obstruction. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:744-756 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140960 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1313875
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Smith JG et al Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Related Genetic Variants With Aortic Valve Calcium and Incident Aortic Stenosis. JAMA. Published online October 26, 2014 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25344734
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Capoulade R et al. Prognostic value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels after exercise in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Heart 2014 Oct; 100:1606 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24993604
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Manning WJ Asymptomatic aortic stenosis in the elderly: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1490-7 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24104373
- ↑ Lindman BR, Bonow RO, Otto CM. Current management of calcific aortic stenosis. Circ Res. 2013 Jul 5;113(2):223-37 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23833296
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Taniguchi T et al. Initial surgical versus conservative strategies in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015 Dec 29; 66:2827 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26477634
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Loscalzo J From Clinical Observation to Mechanism - Heyde's Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1954-1956. November 15, 2012 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23150964 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcibr1205363
Vincentelli A, Susen S, Le Tourneau T et al Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in Aortic Stenosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:343-349. July 24, 2003 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12878741 Free Article <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa022831
Warkentin TE, Moore JC, Morgan DG et al Gastrointestinal Angiodysplasia and Aortic Stenosis N Engl J Med 2002; 347:858-859 September 12, 2002 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12226167 Free full text <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200209123471122 - ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 Nielsen OW, Sajadieh A, Sabbah M et al. Assessing optimal blood pressure in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: The Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study (SEAS). Circulation 2016 Aug 9; 134:455 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486164
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 van Gils L, Clavel MA, Vollema EM et al. Prognostic implications of moderate aortic stenosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017 May 16; 69:2383. <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28494976 <Internet> http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/69/19/2383
Stewart WJ. Aortic stenosis is still very tricky, especially when it is moderate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017 May 16; 69:2393. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28494977 - ↑ Carabello BA. Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2002 Feb 28; 346:677 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11870246 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1313875
- ↑ Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014 Jun 10; 129:e52 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589853 Free full text
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Aortic Stenosis Writing Group. Bonow RO, Brown AS, Gillam LD et al ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29054308 <Internet> http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2017/10/16/j.jacc.2017.09.018
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 NEJM Knowledge+ Question of the Week. July 4, 2017 https://knowledgeplus.nejm.org/question-of-week/156/
- ↑ Ahmed A, Sorajja P, Garberich RF et al Association of Guideline Adherence for Serial Evaluations With Survival and Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis. JAMA Cardiol. Published online September 6, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877303 <Internet> http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/article-abstract/2652880
- ↑ O'Sullivan CJ, Praz F, Stortecky S, Windecker S, Wenaweser P. Assessment of low-flow, low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis: an invasive evaluation is required for decision making. EuroIntervention. 2014 Sep;10 Suppl U:U61-8. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25256333 Free Article
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 Musa TA, Treibel TA, Vassiliou VS et al Myocardial scar and mortality in severe aortic stenosis: Data from the BSCMR Valve Consortium. Circulation 2018 Oct 30; 138:1935. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002099 Free full text https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032839
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 Makkar RR, Yoon SH, Leon MB et al. Association between transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid vs tricuspid aortic stenosis and mortality or stroke. JAMA 2019 Jun 11; 321:2193. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31184741
Barker CM, Reardon MJ. Bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Is there a role for TAVR? JAMA 2019 Jun 11; 321:2170. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31184722 - ↑ 30.0 30.1 Strange G, Stewart S, Celermajer D et al. Poor long-term survival in patients with moderate aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Card 2019 Sep 3 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491546 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109719361923
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 31.2 Kang DH, Sung SJ, Lee SA et al. Early surgery or conservative care for asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2019 Nov 16; PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733181 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1912846
Lancellotti P, Vannan MA. Timing of intervention in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2019 Nov 16; PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733179 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMe1914382 - ↑ NEJM Knowledge+ Question of the Week. Sept 17, 2019 https://knowledgeplus.nejm.org/question-of-week/1554/
Kurtz CE, Otto CM. Aortic stenosis: clinical aspects of diagnosis and management, with 10 illustrative case reports from a 25-year experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2010 Nov 9; 89:349. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21057260 Free full text
Zakkar M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Aortic stenosis: diagnosis and management. BMJ 2016 Oct 19; 355:i5425. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760734 - ↑ 33.0 33.1 Banovic M, Putnik S, Penicka M et al. Aortic Valve ReplAcemenT versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic SeveRe Aortic Stenosis: The AVATAR Trial. Circulation 2021 Nov 13 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779220 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057639
- ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 Otto CM et al 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;143:e00 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33332150 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923
- ↑ 35.0 35.1 Johnson TM, Mahabir CA, Yang Y et al Aortic Stenosis Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis. JAMA Intern Med. Published online July 31, 2023 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523173 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2807944
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 Fleisher LA et al 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25091544 <Internet> http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1893784
Kristensen SD et al - ↑ Bakaeen FG, Rosengart TK, Carabello BA. Aortic stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:ITC1-ITC16. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28030676
- ↑ 38.0 38.1 Unger P et al. Prevalence and outcomes of patients with discordant high-gradient aortic stenosis. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38508842 J Am Coll Cardiol 2024 Mar 26; 83:1109. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735109724002298
O'Sullivan CJ, O'Sullivan D. Discordant high-gradient aortic stenosis: Trust the gradient. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024 Mar 26; 83:1120. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38508843 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735109724002274 - ↑ 39.0 39.1 Charitakis K, Nguyen TC. Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis? Check Troponin, Too. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e012156. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866695 PMCID: PMC6475068 Free PMC article.
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 Julius BK, Spillmann M, Vassalli G, Villari B, Eberli FR, Hess OM. Angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. Mechanisms and pathophysiological concepts. Circulation. 1997 Feb 18;95(4):892-8. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9054747
Patient information
aortic stenosis patient information