aortic valve replacement (AVR)

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Indications

Procedure

Risk factors:

Complications

Postoperative complications:

Notes

prognosis: long-term survival:

  • patients > 80 years
    • 1 year 91%
    • 3 years 84%
    • 5 years 76%
  • patients > 90 years
    • 1 year 81%
    • 2 years 46%[9]
  • no survival benefit of one prothetic heart valve type over another[8]

Left ventricular function improves post-operatively.

Clinical & histological evidence of diastolic dysfunction persists for up to 8 years post-operatively.

Afternoon surgery rather than morning surgery is linked to better outcomes[20]

More general terms

More specific terms

References

  1. Manual of Medical Therapeutics, 28th ed, Ewald & McKenzie (eds), Little, Brown & Co, Boston, 1995, pg 130
  2. Hinchman DA and Otto CM Valvular disease in the elderly. Cardiol Clin 17(1):137, 1999 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10093770
  3. 3.0 3.1 Grub E et al, Percutaneous aortic valve placement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second and current third- generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: Device successes and 30-day clinical outcome. Am Coll Clin Cardiol 2007, 50:69 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17601548
  4. 4.0 4.1 Stassano P et al. Aortic valve replacement: A prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Nov 10; 54:1862. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19892237
    Stone PH. Current selection of optimal prosthetic aortic valve replacement in middle-aged patients: Still dealer's choice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Nov 10; 54:1869. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19892238
  5. 5.0 5.1 Barreto-Filho JA et al. Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States, 1999-2011. JAMA 2013 Nov 20; 310:2078 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24240935
  6. Frilling B, von Renteln-Kruse W, Riess FC. Evaluation of operative risk in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: the predictive value of operative risk scores. Cardiology. 2010;116(3):213-8. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20689278
  7. 7.0 7.1 Dvir D et al Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Failed Bioprosthetic Surgical Valves. JAMA. 2014;312(2):162-170 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005653 <Internet> http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1886189
  8. 8.0 8.1 Chiang YP Survival and Long-term Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 69 Years. JAMA. 2014;312(13):1323-1329 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268439 jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1910112
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 Murashita T et al Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis in the Nonagenarian Patient. Annals or Thoracic Surgery. September 06, 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25200726 <Internet> http://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975%2814%2901296-X/abstract
  10. 10.0 10.1 Thyregod HG et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: One-year results from the all-comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION) randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015 May 26; 65:2184. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25787196
    Tuzcu EM et al. Well-intended NOTION, ahead of practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015 May 26; 65:2195. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25998665
  11. 11.0 11.1 Fink HA, Hemmy LS, MacDonald R et al Intermediate- and Long-Term Cognitive Outcomes After Cardiovascular Procedures in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(2):107-117 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26192563 <Internet> http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2397694
  12. De Santo LS, Romano G, Della Corte A et al Mechanical aortic valve replacement in young women planning on pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes under low oral anticoagulation, a pilot observational study on a comprehensive pre-operative counseling protocol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1110-5. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22421305
  13. 13.0 13.1 Makkar RR et al. Possible subclinical leaflet thrombosis in bioprosthetic aortic valves. N Engl J Med 2015 Oct 5 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26436963
  14. 14.0 14.1 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 9th edition (GRS9) Medinal-Walpole A, Pacala JT, Porter JF (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2016
  15. 15.0 15.1 Saxena A, Dinh DT, Reid CM, Smith JA, Shardey GC, Newcomb AE. Does preoperative atrial fibrillation portend a poorer prognosis in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement? A multicentre Australian study. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jun;29(6):697-703. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23142344
  16. 16.0 16.1 Saxena A, Shi WY, Bappayya S et al Postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated aortic valve replacement: a cause for concern? Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;95(1):133-40. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23200233
  17. 17.0 17.1 Stamou SC, Robich M, Wolf RE, Lovett A, Normand SL, Sellke FW. Effects of gender and ethnicity on outcomes after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):486-92. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22154790 Free Article
  18. 18.0 18.1 Yokota J, Nishi H, Sekiya N, Yamada M, Takahashi T. Atrial fibrillation following aortic valve replacement: impact of perioperative use of intravenous beta-blocker. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):194-199 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28000150
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 Lou N. More Bad News for Embolic Protection Devices. Randomized trial shows little benefit for filtration or suction. MedPage Today. August 09, 2017 https://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Strokes/67168
    Mack MJ, Acker MA, Gelijns AC et al Effect of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices on CNS Infarction in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Aug 8;318(6):536-547. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28787505
  20. 20.0 20.1 Montaigne D, Marechal X, Modine T et al Daytime variation of perioperative myocardial injury in cardiac surgery and its prevention by Rev-Erb alpha antagonism: a single-centre propensity-matched cohort study and a randomised study. The Lancet. Oct 26, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29107324 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32132-3/fulltext
  21. 21.0 21.1 Goldstone AB, Chiu P, Baiocchi M et al Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral- Valve Replacement. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1847-1857. November 9, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117490 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1613792
  22. 22.0 22.1 Drudi LM, Ades M, Turkdogan S et al Association of Depression With Mortality in Older Adults Undergoing Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement. JAMA Cardiol. Published online January 17, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344620 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2669918
    Patel A, Leon MB. Is Depression an Important New Mortality Risk Factor After Aortic Valve Replacement or Simply a Component of the Geriatric Disease Spectrum? JAMA Cardiol. Published online January 17, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344626 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/article-abstract/2669917
  23. 23.0 23.1 Andreasen C, Jorgensen ME, Gislason GH et al Association of Timing of Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery After Stroke With Risk of Recurrent Stroke and Mortality. JAMA Cardiol. Published online April 25, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710128 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2679306
    Mullen MT, Messe SR. Aortic Valve Surgery After Recent Stroke. Patience Is a Virtue. JAMA Cardiol. Published online April 25, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710189 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2679305
  24. 24.0 24.1 Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM et al. The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018 Apr 6 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630873 https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(18)30435-1/pdf
  25. 25.0 25.1 Kalra R, Patel N, Doshi R, Arora G, Arora P. Evaluation of the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement. JAMA Intern Med 2019 Jun 3 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31157821 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2734630
  26. 26.0 26.1 Patel DK, Duncan MS, Shah AS et al Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation With Decreased Hospitalization and Mortality Risk After Cardiac Valve Surgery. JAMA Cardiol. Published online October 23, 2019. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31642866 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/article-abstract/2753611
  27. 27.0 27.1 O'Hair D, Yakubov SJ, Grubb KJ et al Structural Valve Deterioration After Self-Expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients at Intermediate or High Risk. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8(2):111-119. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36515976 PMCID: PMC9857153 (available on 2023-12-14) https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2799709