percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Introduction
An invasive procedure to enlarge the lumen of a narrowed coronary artery by balloon compression. The angioplasty catheter is inserted into a coronary artery, & the cylindrical balloon is inflated at the site of an obstructing atheroma.
Indications
- primary therapy for unstable angina with ST segment elevation* (see CAPITAL AMI study, STEMI)[17]
- rescue therapy
- following failed thrombolysis
- persistent hemodynamic instability or arrhythmia
- 60-90 minutes* after initiation of thrombolytic therapy
- unstable angina
- patient not eligible for thrombolytic therapy
- myocardial infarction
- complicated by cardiogenic shock or CHF[14]
- failure of medical management following initial stabilization
- restenosis of previous coronary artery bypass graft
- elective revascularization for ischemic heart disease due to coronary artery disease
- impaired left ventricular function
- 2 or more vessels with > 50% stenosis
- CABG preferred for multivessel disease with reduced LV ejection fraction[2]
- viable left ventricular myocardium with abnormal wall motion
- 2 or more vessels with > 50% stenosis
- normal left ventricular function with left main, 3-vessel or severe 2-vessel disease
- proximal left anterior descending artery disease
- common clinical practice, improves quality of life[2]
- exception to the single vessel contraindication (MKSAP18)[2]
- impaired left ventricular function
- new onset acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock[2]
* may be better than thrombolysis for primary therapy[9] see 'PTCA vs thrombolysis for acute MI
* 3-24 hours after thrombolytic therapy in asymptomatic patients[61]
# PCI for STEMI in patients with diabetes mellitus #CABG for failed PCI or thrombolytic therapy after STEMI[2] #CABG in with diabetes mellitus otherwise be eligible for PCI (better 5 year survival, 80% vs 65%)
Contraindications
- elective PCI for one vessel disease or chronic stable angina* does not:
- reduce future risk of myocardial infarction
- improve resting left ventricular function
- increase survival
- either PCI or CABG reasonable for left main coronary artery disease[87]
- routine thrombectomy with PCI of no benefit (see thrombectomy)
- late PCI to restore perfusion of infarcted myocardium of no benefit.[18]
- preventive PCI in stable coronary disease of no benefit[19]
- PCI for stable occluded coronary artery disease of little to no benefit[23]
- late PCI for totally occluded coronary artery after myocardial infarction of no benefit[25]
- PCI no better than medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease with proven myocardial ischemia[42][43][44][58][66]
- acute coronary syndrome or NSTEMI[49]
- patients without hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis have favorable long-term prognosis with medical therapy alone[68]
* for some patients with chronic stable angina & coronary ischemia, elective PCI can provide meaningful symptomatic relief & functional benefits[90]
Benefit/risk
- PCI for acute coronary syndrome or NSTEMI[49]
- no mortality benefit
- risk for MI higher for PCI than medical management
- number needed to treat (NNT) to reduce severity of angina pectoris = 9[49]
Laboratory
- reperfusion is associated with higher peak serum CK-MB than persistent occlusion
- platelet-function testing may be clinically relevant for a small proportion of patients[40]
- high platelet reactivity confers risk of stent thrombosis
Procedure
- radial artery vs femoral artery access exposes patients to a bit more but operators to a lot more radiation (77 vs 41 microsieverts at the level of the chest)[62]
- still radial artery access recommended for PCI[82][93]
- loading dose of clopidogrel 600 mg, followed by 150 mg/day for 6 days, then 75 mg/day
- add aspirin 81 mg QD if coronary stenting
- systemic anticoagulation
- bivalirudin anticoagulation[32]
- heparin 70 U/kg is superior to bivalirudin[45]
- bivalirudin vs unfractionated heparin at the time of PCI roughly equivalent[55][64]
- IV nitroglycerin for management of angina
- intravascular imaging vs coronary angiography for visualizing coronary artery anatomy[86]
- eptifibatide (Integrilin) for 12 hours after PTCA
- coronary stenting may reduce the rate of restenosis[7]
- treatment with abciximab with PTCA & coronary stenting may further reduce the rate of restenosis (10% at 6 months[7])
- facilitated PCI with reteplase plus abciximab or abciximab alone started early before PCI did improve outcomes, compared with primary PCI in STEMI patients[21]
- intracoronary abciximab (0.25 mg/kg), delivered into the thrombus region with an infusion catheter[32]
- manual aspiration thrombectomy with the Export catheter in patients with as large thrombus[32]
- routine thrombus aspiration before PCI in patients with STEMI of no benefit[46]
- routine thrombectomy of no benefit[48] & may result in an increased 30 day risk of stroke (0.7% vs 0.3%)
- fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance should be standard of care for most patients with multivessel disease[54][68]
- single vessel fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance of benefit[76]
- complete multivessel revascularization at the time of PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction who present with cardiogenic shock[75]
- fewer early complications & lower mortality with culprit vessel only revascularization[75][82]
- culprit vessel only revascularization associated with lower 1-year mortality if culprit lesion located in the left main coronary artery or proximal left anterior descending artery but not other coronary arteries[78]
- in patients with STEMI & multivessel CAD, complete revascularization increases likelihood of freedom from angina vs culprit-lesion only strategy[85]
- complete revascularization reduces death, MI, stroke, or repeat revascularization within 1 year vs culprit vessel only for STEMI or NSTEMI (RR=0.73, NNT=20)[88]
Complications
- contrast nephropathy[12]
- 30-45% restenosis within 6 months (20% in[7])
- patients with atrial fibrillation requiring warfarin plus clopidogrel plus aspirin at high risk of hemorrhage[36]
- pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous fistula at the site of catheter insertion[2][39]
- duplex ultrasound to distinguish
- stent thrombosis may occur in patients with high platelet reactivity[40]
- accelerated idioventricular rhythm (ventricular tachycardia) is common following coronary reperfusion & does not require intervention when it occurs within the 1st 24 hours[2]
- heart rate < 120/min, usually < 100/min
- device approved for treatment of acute coronary artery perforations during PCI[70]
Management
- PCI should be performed ASAP (as soon as possible)[27]
- revascularization of non-infarct-related arteries in STEMI results in improved outcomes[41]
- revascularization on non-infarct-related arteries after STEMI determined by fractional flow reserve associated with diminished need for revascularization (6.1% vs 17.5%) but not all-cause mortality (1.4% vs 1.7%)[63]
- complete revascularization vs culprit artery only PCI in patients with multivessel disease reduces cardiovascular death & myocardial infarction
- benefits of revascularization during same procedure vs shortly after not established
- antiplatelet therapy
- clopidogrel 600 mg prior to procedure or cangrelor 30 ug/kg bolus & 4 ug/kg infusion followed by 600 mg of clopidogrel at termination of infusion[37]
- pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor)
- prasugrel for STEMI prior to PCI but deferred until after PCI for NSTEMI & other acute coronary syndromes (superior to routine ticagrelor)[91]
- 16% reduction in major cardiovascular events
- 32% increase in major bleeding
- no change in mortality[47]
- dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI
- 1-3 months sufficient[72][92]
- lower bleeding risk with 3 months DAPT than 6 months in elderly without difference in major cardiovascular events[92]
- 1 month of DAPT after PCI for acute coronary syndrome inadequate[81][94]
- 1 month of DAPT after PCI with biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent may be sufficient in high-risk patients[83]
- aspirin 81 mg PO QD + clopidogrel 75 mg daily PO QD[38]
- addition of aspirin 81 mg to ticagrelor for 1-12 months after PCI for acute coronary syndrome of no benefit[74]
- continue P2Y12 inhibitor for 6-12 months[72]
- 1-3 months sufficient[72][92]
- clopidogrel superior to aspirin or ticagrelor for long-term monotherapy[80]
- MKSAP19 disagrees, aspirin indicated vs clopidogrel[2]
- higher cost of prasugrel & ticagrelor vs clopidogrel associated with increased nonfilling of prescriptions[69]
- prasugrel contraindicated in patients with history of stroke[2]
- no benefit to glycoprotein inhibitors as adjunctive treatment to PCI for patients with STEMI[50]
- P2Y12 inhibitor + direct oral anticoagulant if atrial fibrillation[73]
- for older adults with atrial fibrillation & acute MI who undergo PCI, treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) plus warfarin (triple therapy) of no benefit over DAPT alone & may increase risk of bleeding[52][71]
- ACC recommends P2Y12 inhibitor + direct oral anticoagulant (omit aspirin) if atrial fibrillation[79]
- dabigatran 110 mg BID + clopidogrel or ticagrelor[65] (no aspirin) noninferior to triple therapy with respect to thromboembolic events with lower risk of bleeding
- beta-blocker of no benefit in older patients without myocardial infarction[59]
- ranolazine of no benefit for patients with incomplete revascularization after PCI
- atorvastatin 80 mg before & 24 hours after PCI followed by 40 mg PO QD does not reduce major cardiovascular events at 30 days[67]
- combination B vitamins for 6 months
- folate 1 mg, vitamin B12 400 ug, vitamin B6 10 mg PO QD
- reduces serum homocysteine
- reduced combined endpoint: myocardial infarction, death, restenosis (revascularization) {15% vs 23%}[8]
- in other settings, the combination of folate, vitamin B6, & vitamin B12 have not been foun to reduce cardiovascular mortality
- intraluminal radiation, beta-radiation (18 Gy) or gamma-radiation may also reduce rate of restenosis, including those with restenosis after stenting[6]
- cyclosporine prior to PCI of no benefit in patients with anterior wall STEMI[53]
- delay placement of ICD until patient has recovered & medical therapy has been optimized[1]
- same day discharge after PTCA appears safe[29]
- delay non-cardiac surgery for 14 days (no coronary stent)[2][60]
- cardiac stress testing (stress echocardiography) after PCI may be appropriate[33]
- routine electrocardiogram, cardiac stress testing or angiography (invasive or CT angiography) in asymptomatic patients after successful PCI not indicated[2][84]
- avoid smoking marijuana after PCI
- increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or stroke[77]
Notes
- angioplasty would appear superior to streptokinase thrombolysis in the treatment of myocardial infarction, but requires expertise not yet available at many hospitals[4]
- elective PTCA for multivessel disease has a slightly higher mortality than CABG[11]
- at 1 year (5% vs 4%)
- at 5 years (16% vs 14%)
- CABG is superior to PCI for
- severe coronary artery disease[24]; see Syntax trial
- patients with diabetes mellitus[26]
- patients > 65 years of age[26]
- left main coronary artery disease
- multivessel coronary artery disease with involvement of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) & reduced LV ejection fraction[2]
- facilitated percutaneous intervention is the use of pharmaceutical agents before a planned intervention
- mixed results
- pretreatment with clopidogrel decreased combined incidence of sudden death, myocardial infarction & stroke associated with PTCA in patients with STEMI. (4% vs 6%)[15]
- offered no benefit, outcomes may be worse[16]
- would be to become standard of care[37]
- combination of pretreatment with clopidogrel + treatment with abciximab + heparin (during or after procedure) may be of benefit in patient with non-STEMI (see ISAR-REACT 2 trial)
- prasugrel in combination with aspirin may be an option for patients with
- stent thrombosis during clopidogrel treatment
- diabetes mellitus (NGC, NICE)
- percutaneous coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery are noninferior to those at hospitals with on-site surgery[31]
- outcomes independent of procedure appropriateness[34]
- public reporting of acute MI outcomes is associated with
More general terms
More specific terms
Additional terms
- Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investivation (BARI)
- coronary stent/coronary stenting
- ISAR-REACT 2 trial
- percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary stent vs CABG
- Syntax trial
- TIMI study
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Stedman's Medical Dictionary 27th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11,15,16,17,18,19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998,2009,2012,2015,2018,2022.
Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 19 Board Basics. An Enhancement to MKSAP19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2022 - ↑ Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 88-89
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Journal Watch, Mass Med Soc 19(23):181 (Dec) 1999
- ↑ Journal Watch, Mass Med Soc 21(3):24 (Dec) 2001
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Journal Watch 21(5):42, 2001
Verin V, Popowski Y, de Bruyne B et al Endoluminal beta-radiation therapy for the prevention of coronary restenosis after balloon angioplasty. The Dose- Finding Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 25;344(4):243-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11172150
Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses et al Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 25;344(4):250-6. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11172151 - ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Journal Watch 22(10):77, 2002 Stone GW et al, N Engl J Med 346:957, 2002
Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA et al Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 28;346(13):957-66. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11919304 - ↑ 8.0 8.1 Journal Watch 22(19):149, 2002
Schnyder G, Roffi M, Flammer Y, Pin R, Hess OM. Effect of homocysteine-lowering therapy with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: the Swiss Heart study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Aug 28;288(8):973-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12190367 - ↑ 9.0 9.1 Journal Watch 23(5):42, 2003 Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. Review. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12517460
- ↑ Journal Watch 24(8):62, 2004 Mathew V, Gersh BJ, Williams BA et al Outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era: a report from the Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial. Circulation. 2004 Feb 3;109(4):476-80. Epub 2004 Jan 19. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14732749
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Journal Watch 24(14):111, 2004 Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, Schneider JP, Topol EJ, Lauer MS. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation. 2004 May 18;109(19):2290-5. Epub 2004 Apr 26. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15117846
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Oct 6;44(7):1393-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15464318
- ↑ Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, Davies RF, Turek M, Leddy D, Maloney J, McKibbin T, Quinn B, Beanlands RS, Glover C, Marquis JF, O'Brien ER, Williams WL, Higginson LA. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):417-24. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16053952
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, Every N, Sichrovsky T, Hochman JS; NRMI Investigators. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):448-54. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16046651
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lopez-Sendon JL, Montalescot G, Theroux P, Lewis BS, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Braunwald E; Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy (CLARITY)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 28 Investigators. Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics: the PCI-CLARITY study. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1224-32. Epub 2005 Sep 4. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16143698
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Keeley EC et al, Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet 2006 Feb 18; 367:579-88. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16488801
Stone GW and Gersh BJ. Facilitated angioplasty: Paradise lost. Lancet 2006 Feb 18; 367:543-6. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16488779 - ↑ 17.0 17.1 Ting HH et al, A total of 1007 percutaneous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgery: Acute & long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiolo 2006; 47:1713 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16631012
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Hochman JS et al, for the Occluded Artery Trial Investigators. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006, 355 (Nov 14) PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17105759
Hillis LD and Lange RA Myocardial infarction and the open-artery hypothesis. N Engl J Med 2006, 355 (Nov 14) PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17105760 - ↑ 19.0 19.1 Boden WE et al, for the COURAGE Trial Research Group Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:1503 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17387127
Hochman JS & Sten PG Does preventive PCI work? N Engl J Med 2007, March 27 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17387128 - ↑ King SB III et al, 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 51:172 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18191745
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, van Boven AJ, Widimsky P, Janssens L, Andersen HR, Betriu A, Savonitto S, Adamus J, Peruga JZ, Kosmider M, Katz O, Neunteufl T, Jorgova J, Dorobantu M, Grinfeld L, Armstrong P, Brodie BR, Herrmann HC, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Effron MB, Barnathan ES, Topol EJ; FINESSE Investigators. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2205-17. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18499565
Leopold JA. Does thrombolytic therapy facilitate or foil primary PCI? N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2277-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18499572 - ↑ King SB et al, 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 Jan 15;51(2):172-209 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18191745
Canadian Cardiovascular Society; American Academy of Family Physicians; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;51(2):210-47. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18191746 - ↑ 23.0 23.1 Mark DB et al for the Occluded Artery Trial Investigators. Quality of life after late invasive therapy for occluded arteries. N Engl J Med 2009 Feb 19; 360:774. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19228620
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 Serruys PW et al for the SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009 Feb 18; [e-pub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804626 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19228612
Lange RA and Hillis LD. SYNTAX in context. N Engl J Med 2009 Feb 18; [e-pub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe0900452 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19228611 - ↑ 25.0 25.1 Mark DB et al. Quality of life after late invasive therapy for occluded arteries. N Engl J Med 2009 Feb 19; 360:774. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19228620
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Hlatky MA et al, Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials Lancet. 2009 Apr 4;373(9670):1190-7. Epub 2009 Mar 19. <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19303634 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60552-3/abstract
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 Rathore SS et al Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study BMJ 2009;338:b1807 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454739 <Internet> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/may19_1/b1807
- ↑ Prescriber's Letter 16(10): 2009 The Case for a Higher Maintenance Dose of Clopidogrel (Plavix) Detail-Document#: http://prescribersletter.com/(5bhgn1a4ni4cyp2tvybwfh55)/pl/ArticleDD.aspx?li=1&st=1&cs=&s=PRL&pt=3&fpt=25&dd=251004&pb=PRL (subscription needed) http://www.prescribersletter.com
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 Rao SV et al Prevalence and Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Older Patients JAMA. 2011, 306(13):1461-1467 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21972308 <Internet> http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/13/1461.abstract
- ↑ Levine GN et al 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary American College of Cardiology Foundation American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions J Am Coll Cardiol, November 7, 2011 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22070837 <Internet> http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/full/j.jacc.2011.08.006v1 corresponding NGC guideline withdrawn Nov 2016
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 Aversano T et al. Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2012 Mar 25 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22443460 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1114540
- ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Stone GW et al. Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: The INFUSE-AMI randomized trial. JAMA 2012 Mar 25 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22447888 <Internet> http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/early/2012/03/21/jama.2012.421
- ↑ 33.0 33.1 Harb SC et al Exercise Testing in Asymptomatic Patients After Revascularization: Are Outcomes Altered? Arch Intern Med. 2012;():1-8 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22905351 <Internet> http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1151706
- ↑ 34.0 34.1 Bradley SM et al. Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness and in-hospital procedural outcomes: Insights from the NCDR. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5:290. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22576845
- ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 Shiomi H et al. Association of onset to balloon and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction having primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Observational study. BMJ 2012 May 23; 344:e3257 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22623632
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 Lamberts M et al. Bleeding after initiation of multiple antithrombotic drugs, including triple therapy, in atrial fibrillation patients following myocardial infarction and coronary intervention: A nationwide cohort study. Circulation 2012 Sep 4; 126:1185. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22869839
Maggioni AP. Acute coronary syndrome in patients with atrial fibrillation: What is the benefit/risk profile of triple antithrombotic therapy? Circulation 2012 Sep 4; 126:1176 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22869840 - ↑ 37.0 37.1 37.2 Bhatt DL et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med 2013 Mar 10 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473369 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1300815
Lange RA and Hillis LD. The duel between dual antiplatelet therapies. N Engl J Med 2013 Mar 10 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473370 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1302504 - ↑ 38.0 38.1 Brilakis ES, Patel VG, Banerjee S Medical Management After Coronary Stent Implantation. A Review. JAMA. 2013;310(2):189-198 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23839753 <Internet> http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1710463
- ↑ 39.0 39.1 Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA et al Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):317-26 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19463320
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 40.2 Stone GW et al. for the ADAPT-DES Investigators. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): A prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet 2013 Jul 27 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890998 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)61170-8/fulltext
- ↑ 41.0 41.1 Wald DS et al. for the PRAMI Investigators. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013 Sep 1 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23991625 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1305520
Mauri L. Nonculprit lesions - Innocent or guilty by association. N Engl J Med 2013 Sep 1 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23991624 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1309383
American College of Cardiology Updates Heart Attack Recommendations. Sept 22, 2014 http://www.cardiosource.org/en/News-Media/Media-Center/News-Releases/2014/09/Choosing-Wisely-Statement.aspx - ↑ 42.0 42.1 Stergiopoulos K et al Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients With Stable Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Ischemia. A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med. Published online December 02, 2013 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296791 <Internet> http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1783047
Katz MH Evolving Treatment Options in Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Intern Med. Published online December 02, 2013 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296643 <Internet> http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1783042 - ↑ 43.0 43.1 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 8th edition (GRS8) Durso SC and Sullivan GN (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2013
- ↑ 44.0 44.1 Maron DJ, Boden WE, Spertus JA et al Impact of metabolic syndrome and diabetes on prognosis and outcomes with early percutaneous coronary intervention in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 5;58(2):131-7. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718908
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 Shahzad A et al Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 5 July 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002178 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2960924-7/abstract
Berger PB and Blankenship JC Is the heat on HEAT-PPCI appropriate? The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 5 July 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002176 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2961041-2/fulltext
Shaw D HEAT-PPCI sheds light on consent in pragmatic trials. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 5 July 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25002175 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2961040-0/fulltext - ↑ 46.0 46.1 Lagerqvist B et al. Outcomes 1 year after thrombus aspiration for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2014 Sep 1 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25176395 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1405707
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 Bellemain-Appaix A et al Reappraisal of thienopyridine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014;349:g6269 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25954988 <Internet> http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6269
- ↑ 48.0 48.1 Jolly SS et al Randomized Trial of Primary PCI with or without Routine Manual Thrombectomy. N Engl J Med. March 16, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25775387 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1415098
Crea F Coronary Microvascular Obstruction - A Puzzle with Many Pieces. N Engl J Med. March 16, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25775222 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1501882 - ↑ 49.0 49.1 49.2 49.3 The NNT: Early Invasive Management for Acute Coronary Syndromes. http://www.thennt.com/nnt/early-invasive-management-for-acute-coronary-syndromes/
Hoenig MR, Aroney CN, Scott IA. Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004815 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20238333 - ↑ 50.0 50.1 The NNT: Glycoprotein Inhibitors given for Major Heart Attack (STEMI) Patients Receiving Stents or Angioplasty. http://www.thennt.com/nnt/glycoprotein-inhibitors-for-stemi/
- ↑ 51.0 51.1 Waldo SW et al. Association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015 Mar 24; 65:1119. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790884
Moscucci M. Public reporting of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: Harm or benefit? J Am Coll Cardiol 2015 Mar 24; 65:1127. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790885 - ↑ 52.0 52.1 Hess CN et al Use and Outcomes of Triple Therapy Among Older Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(6):616-627 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248987 <Internet> http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleID=2422306
Valle JA, Messenger JC Triple Therapy...Can We Replace More With Better? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(6):628-630 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248988 <Internet> http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleID=2422302 - ↑ 53.0 53.1 Cung TT, Morel O, Cayla G et al Cyclosporine before PCI in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. August 30, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321103 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1505489
- ↑ 54.0 54.1 van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA et al Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. August 30, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26333474 <Internet> http://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2900057-4/abstract
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 Valgimigli M et al Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. Sept 1, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26324049 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1507854
Berger PB Finding the Proper Context for the MATRIX Trial. N Engl J Med. Sept 1, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26324050 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1509637
Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G et al Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2218-30 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18499566 - ↑ Lip GY, Huber K, Andreotti F Antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing coronary stenting: executive summary--a Consensus Document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2010 Jun;31(11):1311-8. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20447945
- ↑ Bonnemeier H, Ortak J, Wiegand UK Accelerated idioventricular rhythm in the post-thrombolytic era: incidence, prognostic implications, and modulating mechanisms after direct percutaneous coronary intervention. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Apr;10(2):179-87. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842430
- ↑ 58.0 58.1 Sedlis SP et al Effect of PCI on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1937-1946. November 12, 2015. <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26559572 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1505532
- ↑ 59.0 59.1 Young K, Fairchild DG, Hefner JE Beta-Blockers Might Not Benefit Some Seniors After PCI. Physician's First Watch, Aug 16, 2016 David G. Fairchild, MD, MPH, Editor-in-Chief Massachusetts Medical Society http://www.jwatch.org
Motivala AA, Parikh V, Roe M et al Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients >=65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Insights From the NCDR Registry J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(16):1639-1648 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539683 <Internet> http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=2544548
Nappi AG, Boden WE Should Beta-Blockers Continue to Be Used in Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients Without Myocardial Infarction? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(16):1649-1651 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27539684 <Internet> http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=2544559 - ↑ 60.0 60.1 Fleisher LA et al 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25091544 <Internet> http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1893784
Kristensen SD et al 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J (2014). August 2014 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25086026 <Internet> http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/07/28/eurheartj.ehu282.extrac - ↑ 61.0 61.1 Coronary Revascularization Writing Group. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ et al ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 14, 2016 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28012615 <Internet> http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2016/12/15/j.jacc.2016.10.034
- ↑ 62.0 62.1 Sciahbasi A, Frigoli E, Sarandrea A et al. Radiation exposure and vascular access in acute coronary syndromes: The RADMatrix Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017 Mar 15; <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28330794 <Internet> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109717360424
- ↑ 63.0 63.1 Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann FJ et al for the Compare- Acute Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2017 Mar 18; <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317428 Free full text <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1701067
Kober L. Complete revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction? N Engl J Med 2017 Mar 18; <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317460 Free Article <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMe1702825 - ↑ 64.0 64.1 Erlinge D, Omerovic E, Frobert O et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2017 Aug 27; <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28844201 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1706443
Stone GW. Procedural anticoagulation in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2017 Aug 27 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28844194 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMe1709247 - ↑ 65.0 65.1 Cannon CP, Bhatt DL, Oldgren J, et al. Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1513-1524. October 19, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28844193 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1708454
- ↑ 66.0 66.1 Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM et al Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Nov 2, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29103656 <Internet> http://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32714-9/fulltext
Brown DL, Redberg RF Last nail in the coffin for PCI in stable angina? The Lancet. Nov 2, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29103657 <Internet> http://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32757-5/fulltext - ↑ 67.0 67.1 Berwanger O, Santucci EV, Melo de Barros E Silva PGM et al Effect of Loading Dose of Atorvastatin Prior to Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome. The SECURE-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Published online March 11, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525821 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2675023
Nicholls SJ, Psaltis PJ. Lipid Lowering in Acute Coronary SyndromeIs Treatment Early Enough? JAMA. Published online March 11, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525819 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2675022 - ↑ 68.0 68.1 68.2 Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ et al Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve. N Engl J Med. May 22, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785878 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1803538
- ↑ 69.0 69.1 Dayoub EJ, Seigerman M, Tuteja S et al. Trends in platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor inhibitor use and adherence among antiplatelet-naive patients after percutaneous coronary intervention, 2008-2016. JAMA Intern Med 2018 May 21; PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799992 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2681655
Lauffenburger JC, Choudhry NK. A call for a systems-thinking approach to medication adherence: Stop blaming the patient. JAMA Intern Med 2018 May 21; PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799994 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2681650 - ↑ 70.0 70.1 FDA News Release. Sept 14, 2018 FDA approves device for treatment of acute coronary artery perforations. https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm620603.htm
- ↑ 71.0 71.1 Lopes RD, Hong H, Harskamp RE et al Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA Cardiol. Published online June 19, 2019. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215979 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2735647
- ↑ 72.0 72.1 72.2 Watanabe H, Domei R, Morimoto T et al Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(24):2414-2427. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237644 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2736563
Hahn JY, Song YB, Oh JH et al Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(24):2428-2437 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237645 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2736564
Ziada KM, Moliterno DJ. Dual Antiplatelet TherapyIs It Time to Cut the Cord With Aspirin? JAMA. 2019;321(24):2409-2411 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237621 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2736537 - ↑ 73.0 73.1 Lopes RD, Hong H, Harskamp RE et al Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(8):747-755, June 19, 2019 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215979 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2735647
- ↑ 74.0 74.1 Tomaniak M et al Benefit and Risks of Aspirin in Addition to Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndromes. A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized GLOBAL LEADERS Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(11):1092-1101. Sept 26, 2019 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31557763 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2752077
- ↑ 75.0 75.1 75.2 Khera R et al. Revascularization practices and outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who presented with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock in the US, 2009-2018 JAMA Intern Med 2020 Aug 24; [e-pub] PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833024 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2769548
DeJong C, Redberg RF. Multivessel or culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Real-world evidence in support of CULPRIT-SHOCK. JAMA Intern Med 2020 Aug 24; [e-pub] PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833000 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2769541 - ↑ 76.0 76.1 Sud M, Han L, Koh M et al Association Between Adherence to Fractional Flow Reserve Treatment Thresholds and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA. Published online November 13, 2020 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33185655 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2020.22708
Bach RG Physiology-Based Revascularization Decisions and Improved Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. JAMA. Published online November 13, 2020 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33185653 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2020.22998 - ↑ 77.0 77.1 Busko M Marijuana Use Tied to Repeat MI, Stroke After PCI. Medscape - Nov 19, 2020. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941313
- ↑ 78.0 78.1 Farhan S, Vogel B, Montalescot G et al Association of Culprit Lesion Location With Outcomes of Culprit-Lesion-Only vs Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock. A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(12):1329-1337. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845312 PMCID: PMC7450400 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2769748
- ↑ 79.0 79.1 Beck DL ACC Issues Guidance on Antithrombotic Therapy. Medscape - Dec 23, 2020 https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/943139
- ↑ 80.0 80.1 Susman E Plavix Beats Aspirin, Brilinta After Stenting. HOST-EXAM and TALOS-AMI studies from South Korea focus on aspects of DAPT.
Koo BK, Kang J, Park KW et al Aspirin versus clopidogrel for chronic maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (HOST-EXAM): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, multOne-Month DAPT Enough for Complex PCI if Bleeding Risk HighOne-Month DAPT Enough for Complex PCI if Bleeding Risk Highicentre trial. Lancet 2021. May 16 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34010616 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01063-1/fulltext - ↑ 81.0 81.1 Zoler ML STOP-DAPT 2 ACS: 1 Month of DAPT Proves Inadequate for Patients With Recent ACS. Medscape. September 03, 2021 https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/958178
- ↑ 82.0 82.1 82.2 Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022 Jan 18; 145:e4 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882436 Free article. Review. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022 Jan 18; 145:e18. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 - ↑ 83.0 83.1 Hughes S One-Month DAPT Enough for Complex PCI if Bleeding Risk High. Medscape. May 18, 2022 https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/974224
Valgimigli M et al Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention In Patients at High Bleeding Risk: a MASTER DAPT trial sub-analysis. European Heart Journal. 2022. May 17. ehac284 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35580836 https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac284/6587125 - ↑ 84.0 84.1 Park DW et al. Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. N Engl J Med 2022 Aug 28; [e-pub]. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36036496 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2208335
- ↑ 85.0 85.1 Mehta SR, Wang J, Wood DA et al Complete Revascularization vs Culprit Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Angina-Related Quality of Life in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Results From the COMPLETE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(11):1091-1099. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36129696 PMCID: PMC9494273 (available on 2023-09-21) https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2796743
- ↑ 86.0 86.1 Bosworth T Intravascular Imaging Bests Angiography for Complex PCI. Medscape. March 5, 2023 https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/989111
- ↑ 87.0 87.1 Gaba P, Christiansen EH, M, Nielsen PH et al Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes. A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Cardiol. Published online May 31, 2023 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256598 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2805580
- ↑ 88.0 88.1 Biscaglia S et al. Complete or culprit-only PCI in older patients with myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2023 Aug 26; [e-pub]. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37634150 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2300468
- ↑ Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2016;133:1135-47. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490017
- ↑ 90.0 90.1 Rajkumar CA et al. A placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina. N Engl J Med 2023 Nov 11 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38015442 PMCID: PMC7615400 Free PMC article https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2310610
- ↑ 91.0 91.1 Schupke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M; ISAR-REACT 5 Trial Investigators. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475799 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1908973
- ↑ 92.0 92.1 92.2 Park DY, Hu JR, Jamil Y et al. Shorter Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Older Adults After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244000. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38546647 PMCID: PMC10979312 Free PMC article
- ↑ 93.0 93.1 Lou N Transradial PCI Finally Normalized in the U.S., Though Holdouts Remain. Adoption approached 60% as recently as 2022. MedPage Today May 2, 2024 https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/scai/109937
- ↑ 94.0 94.1 Kesarwani M. After PCI for ACS or stable CAD, DAPT for 1 mo vs. >1 mo reduces major bleeding without increasing stent thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Dec 3. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39622065 https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03059-JC
- ↑ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/percutaneous-coronary-intervention