chronic mitral regurgitation (MR)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Classification
- mild
- vena contracta < 0.30 cm
- regurgitant oriface area < 0.20 cm2
- regurgitant volume < 30 mL
- regurgitant fraction < 30%
- moderate
- vena contracta 0.30-0.69 cm
- regurgitant oriface area 0.20-0.39 cm2
- regurgitant volume 30-59 mL
- regurgitant fraction 30-49%
- severe
- vena contracta >- 0.7 cm
- regurgitant oriface area >= 0.40 cm2
- regurgitant volume >= 60 mL
- regurgitant fraction >= 50%
* primary: involves mitral annulus only[3]
* secondary: involves causes other than mitral annulus (ventricular dysfunction)
Etiology
- mitral valve prolapse (most common)[3]
- myxomatous degeneration of the mitral valve (common)
- rheumatic heart disease
- calcification of the mitral valve annulus
- coronary artery disease associated with papillary muscle dysfunction
- infective endocarditis
- connective tissue diseases
- secondary phenomenon associated with left ventricular dilation
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Epidemiology
- young adult with history of rheumatic fever
- 9.3% of elderly (> 75 years)[7]
Pathology
- left ventricular volume overload
- marked ventricular dysfunction generally occurs prior to a significant decline in LV ejection fraction (LVEF)
- decrease left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with progression of disease
- left atrial enlargement with progression of disease
- atrial fibrillation with left atrial enlargement
- mitral regurgitation increases markedly with exercise in 32% of patients[9]
Clinical manifestations
- apical holosystolic or late systolic murmur
- murmur best heard at the apex
- usual murmur is crescendo-decrescendo
- rheumatic MR is usually plateau
- murmur may be decreased with diminished cardiac output
- radiates to left axilla or base if posterior leaflet is involved
- Valsalva maneuver moves onset of murmur closer to S1
- handgrip increases intensity of murmur
- no change in murmur after extra-systole
- systolic click in mitral valve prolapse
- displaced & enlarged point of maximum impulse (PMI)
- decreased S1, widely split S2, S3 audible, increased P2
- preserved carotid pulsations
- orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, edema
Diagnostic procedures
- electrocardiogram is generally abnormal
- left atrial enlargement is common
- atrial fibrillation may occur
- left ventricular hypertrophy with or without ST-T wave changes
- echocardiography is indicated for all holosystolic murmurs
- doppler
- transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)
- if visualization inadequate with transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)[3][17]
- alternative is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- severe mitral regurgitation: regurgitant orifice area >= 0.4 cm2, regurgitant fraction >50%
- unfavorable surgical outcomes suggested by:
- left ventricular end diastolic volume of > 7.0 cm
- left ventricular end systolic volume of > 4.5 cm
- left ventricular ejection fraction of < 60%
- frequency of serial evaluation
- every 1-2 years for moderate mitral regurgitation (regurgitant fraction <50%)
- every 6-12 months for severe mitral regurgitation (regurgitant fraction >50%)[3]
- repeat echocardiography indicated when there is a change in clinical status (even if most recent echocardiogram was 3-4 months prior)[3]
- cardiac catheterization
- standard for assessing severity of MR
- required for evaluating patient for mitral valve replacement (MVR)
- exercise stress testing may be useful for identifying asymptomatic patients at risk[5]
Radiology
- cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- alternative to transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) when
- visualization is inadequate with transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)
- assessment from TTE disrepant from clinical assessment from symptoms
- alternative to transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) when
Differential diagnosis
- aortic stenosis
- murmur of aortic stenosis is louder & longer after extra-systole in contrast to MR
- mitral valve prolapse
- infectious endocarditis
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- ischemic heart disease
- ventricular dilation
- Marfan's disease
- use of appetite suppressants (fenfluramine-phentermine)
Management
- Medical therapy for secondary mitral regurgitation
- prophylaxis for infective endocarditis
- anticoagulation
- atrial fibrillation
- ref[3] recommends continued warfarin even in the absence of evidence of further atrial fibrillation after surgical repair
- left atrial enlargement
- previous embolic event
- incidence of thromboembolic events is less than that for mitral stenosis
- atrial fibrillation
- atrial fibrillation
- cardioversion (see atrial fibrillation)
- 3 weeks of anticoagulation indicated prior to elective cardioversion
- rhythm control unlikely to be sustainable in a patient with left atrial enlargement
- ventricular rate control
- cardioversion (see atrial fibrillation)
- vasodilators have not been shown to reduce progression of LV dysfunction[3][4]
- decrease systemic vascular resistance (SVR)
- used primarily in patients with contraindication(s) to surgery[3]
- beta-blocker may improve LV dysfunction[11]
- diuretics useful for treating congestive symptoms
- loop diuretic
- spironolactone may be useful
- digoxin may be useful if LV systolic dysfunction
- nitrates reduce:
- Surgery:
- indications
- moderate to severe disease
- symptomatic despite optimized medical management
- LV dilation
- left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%
- LVEF 30-60% (indicates moderate LV dysfunction)[3]
- early surgical repair is associated with reduced late cardiac mortality & cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral stenosis[14]
- mitral valve repair for moderate MR during CABG reduces MR at 12 months, but does not improve reverse LV remodeling or improve survival or quality of life[16]
- minimal to mild symptoms
- mitral valve replacement (MVR) or repair when
- LV dilatation: LV end-systolic dimension > 40-45 mm
- decreasing LVEF with LVEF 30-60%
- pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50 mm Hg
- exercise-induced increase in pulmonary artery pressures of >= 25 mm Hg
- new onset atrial fibrillation
- mitral valve surgery NOT indicated if LVEF < 30%
- surgery for regurgitant orifice of > 40 mm2[4]
- close monitoring for regurgitant orifice of 20-40 mm2[4]
- moderate to severe mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons[3]
- new-onset atrial fibrillation[3]
- advanced age NOT a contraindication[6]
- operative mortality 5-15% (mitral valve replacement)[10]
- mitral valve replacement (MVR) or repair when
- moderate to severe disease
- mitral valve repair, when feasible, preferable to mitral valve replacement[3][4]
- bioprosthetic valve preferred over mechanical valve[3][10]
- outcomes similar at 1 year for mitral valve replacement vs mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation secondary to ischemic heart disease[13]
- transcatheter mitral valve repair improves survival in high surgical risk patients[15]
- no difference in survival at 2 years for repair vs replacement, but recurrence of mitral regurgitation more common with repair[19]
- 15-year recurrence after mitral valve repair is 13%[20]
- older age, residual mild MR in the operating room, bileaflet or anterior leaflet prolapse, & absence of ring annuloplasty predict recurrent MR[20]
- MitraClip, a transcatheter system for mitral valve repair in patients with high surgical risk[3]
- indications
- follow-up
- mild:
- clinical evaluation yearly
- echocardiography only if symptomatic
- moderate
- clinical evaluation yearly
- echocardiography every 1-2 years[3]
- severe
- clinical evaluation every 6-12 months
- echocardiography every 6-12 months[3]
- mild:
More general terms
Additional terms
References
- ↑ Manual of Medical Therapeutics, 28th ed, Ewald & McKenzie (eds), Little, Brown & Co, Boston, 1995, pg 128-29
- ↑ Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 44
- ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2022
Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 19 Board Basics. An Enhancement to MKSAP19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2022 - ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Journal Watch 25(7):55-56, 2005
Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D, Capps M, Nkomo V, Scott C, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ. Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):875-83. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15745978
Otto CM, Salerno CT. Timing of surgery in asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 3;352(9):928-9. No abstract available. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15745985 - ↑ 5.0 5.1 Messika-Zeitoun D, Johnson BD, Nkomo V, Avierinos JF, Allison TG, Scott C, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing determination of functional capacity in mitral regurgitation: physiologic and outcome implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 20;47(12):2521-7. Epub 2006 May 30. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16781383
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Detaint D et al, Surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in the elderly; Outcomes and recent improvements. Circulation 2006, 114:265 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16847151
St John Sutton MG and Gorman RC Surgery for asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation in the elderly: Early surgery or wait and watch? Circulation 2006, 114:258 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16864737 - ↑ 7.0 7.1 Nkomo VT et al, Burden of valvular heart diseases: A population-based study. Lancet 2006, 368:1005 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16980116
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Wilson W et al, Prevention of infective endocardititis: guidelines from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease Committe, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. J AM Dent Assoc 2008, 139:3S
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Magne J et al. Exercise-induced changes in degenerative mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 Jul 20; 56:300. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633822
Flachskampf FA. Mitral regurgitation is incompletely characterized at rest. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 Jul 20; 56:310 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633823 - ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 7th edition Parada JT et al (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Ahmed MI, Aban I, Lloyd SG, Gupta H et al A randomized controlled phase IIb trial of beta(1)-receptor blockade for chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 28;60(9):833-8 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22818065
Carabello BA. Beta-blockade for mitral regurgitation: Could the management of valvular heart disease actually be moving into the 21st century? J Am Coll Cardiol 2012 Aug 28; 60:839 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22818062 - ↑ Foster E. Clinical practice. Mitral regurgitation due to degenerative mitral-valve disease. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 8;363(2):156-65 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647211
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Acker MA et al. Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2013 Nov 18 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24245543 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1312808
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Kang D-H et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment for asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation: A propensity analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 Jun 10; 63:2398. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24694528
Borer JS. Early surgery or watchful waiting for asymptomatic severe degenerative mitral regurgitation: Is the answer now clear? J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 Jun 10; 63:2408 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24694527 - ↑ 15.0 15.1 Swaans MJ et al. Survival of transcatheter mitral valve repair compared with surgical and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014 Aug; 7:875. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25147032
Bonow RO. The saga continues: Does mitral valve repair improve survival in secondary mitral regurgitation? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014 Aug; 7:882 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25147033 - ↑ 16.0 16.1 Smith PK et al. Surgical treatment of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2014 Nov 18 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25405390 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1410490
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Solis J, Piro V, Vazquez de Prada JA, Loughlin G Echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation: general considerations. Cardiol Clin. 2013 May;31(2):165-8. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743069
- ↑ Rogers JH, Franzen O. Percutaneous edge-to-edge MitraClip therapy in the management of mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct;32(19):2350-7 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21606080
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC et al Two-Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. N Engl J Med. November 9, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26550689 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1512913
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 Suri RM, Clavel MA, Schaff HV et al Effect of Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation Following Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair: Long-Term Analysis of Competing Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 9;67(5):488-98. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846946
Bonow RO, Adams DH. The Time Has Come to Define Centers of Excellence in Mitral Valve Repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 9;67(5):499-501. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846947 - ↑ Velu JF, Kortlandt FA, Hendriks T et al Comparison of Outcome After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair With the MitraClip in Patients With Versus Without Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;120(11):2035-2040. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29033048 Free Article
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Kortlandt F, Velu J, Schurer R et al. Survival after MitraClip treatment compared to surgical and conservative treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with mitral regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018 Jun; 11:e005985. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895598 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005985
Sorajja P, Gossl M. Waiting to exhale: Transcatheter repair of mitral regurgitation and survival. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018 Jun; 11:e006749. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895604 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006749 - ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 Hilzenrath D, Hacker KK When Medical Devices Malfunction. From Dr. Oz to Heart Valves: A Tiny Device Charted a Contentious Path Through the FDA. KFF Health News. 2024. July 9. https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/mitraclip-heart-valve-device-dr-oz-fda/