mitral stenosis (MS)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Introduction
Mitral stenosis (MS) impedes blood flow from the lungs & left atrium into the left ventricle.
Classification
- mild
- mitral valve area > 1.5 cm2
- mean pressure gradient < 5 mm Hg
- pulmonary artery systolic pressure < 30 mm Hg
- moderate
- mitral valve area 1.0-1.5 cm2
- mean pressure gradient 5-10 mm Hg
- pulmonary artery systolic pressure 30-50 mm Hg
- severe
- mitral valve area < 1.0 cm2
- mean pressure gradient >10 mm Hg
- pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50 mm Hg
Etiology
- rheumatic heart disease (most common, almost always)
- thickening & fusion of mitral valve leaflets
- generally presents 20-40 years after rheumatic fever[3]
- Ca+2 deposition in mitral annulus & leaflets
- congenital valvular malformation
- association with connective tissue disorders
- prosthetic valves (especially bioprosthetic valves) may become stenotic
Pathology
- Elevation of left atrial pressure
- Elevation of pulmonary venous pressure
- Elevation of pulmonary capillary pressure
- pulmonary congestion
- pressure elevation depends upon the pressure gradient across the valve which in turn depends upon:
- severity of obstruction
- flow across the mitral valve
- time allowed for diastolic filling of left ventricle
- presence of an effective atrial contraction
- factors increasing flow across stenotic mitral valve may cause a marked increase in left atrial pressure & exacerbate heart failure
- pregnancy
- Left atrial enlargement & atrial fibrillation
- may result in atrial thrombus formation
- high incidence of systemic embolization in patients with mitral stenosis who are not anticoagulated (20%)
- right ventricular hypertrophy is a late manifestation
Clinical manifestations
- symptoms do not develop for several years after signs of mitral stenosis are detectable on physical examination
- signs
- variable S1
- accentuation of P2 suggests pulmonary hypertension[3]
- early diastolic opening snap (opening snap after S2) if leaflets are mobile
- rumbling, low-pitched apical diastolic murmur (decrescendo)
- the longer the murmur, the more severe the stenosis
- intensity of the murmur correlates with transvalvular pressure gradient[3]
- best heard at apex in the left lateral decubitus position
- no radiation of murmur
- prominent jugular venous a wave
- prominent tapping apical impulse
- right heart failure
- symptoms
- fatigue & dyspnea on exertion
- pulmonary congestion
- orthopnea & paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
- atrial fibrillation causes significant exacerbation of symptoms
- diffuse alveolar hemorrhage may occur
Diagnostic procedures
- electrocardiogram
- notched P wave, duration > 0.12 sec in ECG lead II
- right ventricular hypertrophy
- left atrial enlargement
- echocardiography*
- confirm mitral stenosis
- access chamber size & function
- detect left atrial thrombus
- assess pulmonary artery pressure
- trans-esophageal echocardiogram
- to evaluate thromboembolism (left atrial appendage thrombus)[3]
- better defines valvular anatomy
- mean gradient:
- mitral valve area
- 1.5-2 cm2: mild
- 1-1.5 cm2: moderate
- < 1 cm2: severe
- frequency of serial evaluation
- every 3-5 years for mild MS
- every 1-2 years for moderate MS
- every year for severe MS
- frequency of serial evaluation
- exercise echocardiography
- disparate findings of symptoms vs resting echocardiogram
- cardiac catheterization
- concomitant coronary artery disease
- suboptimal or nondiagnostic echocardiogram
- other suspected valvular lesions such as mitral regurgitation
* video[10]
Radiology
- chest x-ray
- enlargement of pulmonary artery, right ventricle, right atrium, left atrium
- straightening of left heart border
- large left atrial shadow
- dilated upper lobe pulmonary veins
- Kerley B lines may be present with severe stenosis
Complications
Differential diagnosis
- left atrial myxoma
- mitral valve endocarditis associated with mitral regurgitation
- marantic endocarditis not associated with cardiac murmur
- cor triatriatum
Management
- avoid &/or treat factors which elevate left atrial pressure
- vigorous physical activity
- fever
- tachycardia
- pregnancy: repair indicated prior to conception[3]
- diuretics & long-acting nitrates for pulmonary congestion & edema[3]
- beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker for sinus tachycardia allows greater time for ventricular filling
- co-existent atrial fibrillation
- high risk of thromboembolic events
- anticoagulation indicated
- pharmacologic control of ventricular rate
- cardioversion
- synchronized DC cardioversion if hemodynamically compromised
- attempt to restore sinus rhythm indicated except in presence of marked left atrial enlargement
- elective attempts at chemical cardioversion or electrical cardioversion should be preceded by anticoagulation for 3 weeks to minimize risk of thromboembolic event after restoration of sinus rhythm
- chemical cardioversion with type Ia anti-arrhythmic agent
- synchronized DC cardioversion if chemical cardioversion fails
- continue type Ia anti-arrhythmic agent after successful cardioversion to maintain sinus rhythm
- radiofrequency ablation if mitral valve surgery[4]
- long-term anticoagulation, target INR 2-3
- history of prior thromboembolism
- paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or chronic atrial fibrillation
- left atrial diameter > 5.5 cm
- left atrial thrombus
- prophylaxis for infective endocarditis[5]
- no longer routinely indicated[6]
- continuous prophylaxis against rheumatic fever
- young patients
- patients at high risk for Streptococcal infection
- parents of young children
- school teachers
- medical personnel
- military personnel
- patients living in crowded conditions
- patients with acute rheumatic fever within 5 years
- surgery
- procedures
- percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy
- see percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (below)
- mitral valve replacement (MVR)
- operative mortality high in elderly (5-15%)[7]
- percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy
- indications
- symptoms, NYHA functional class 3 or 4
- pulmonary hypertension
- pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 50 mm Hg at rest or > 60 mm Hg with exercise
- mitral valve area < 1 cm2/m2 (body surface area)
- recurrent systemic thromboembolism (not mentioned in MKSAP17)
- severe mitral stenosis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons[3]
- pregnancy if percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty not feasible
- also see percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty
- procedures
- percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (commissurotomy)
- favorable valve morphology
- patients at high risk for surgery
- young age without contraindications
- indications
- symptomatic
- mitral valve area < 1.5 cm2
- pliable, non-calcified leaflets
- pulmonary artery pressure > 50 mm Hg at rest or > 60 mm Hg with exercise[3]
- pregnancy or planned pregnancy in patients with severe mitral stenosis, regardless of symptoms[3]
- mitral valve balloon angioplasty for most patients[2]
- contraindications
- significant (> mild) mitral regurgitation
- calcified mitral valve
- most elderly are not candidates
- atrial thrombus
- recent thromboembolic events
- favorable valve morphology
Follow-up (asymptomatic mitral stenosis)
- clinical evaluation yearly[3]
- echocardiogram to assess aortic valve area[4]
- yearly for severe MS
- every 1-2 years for moderate MS
- every 3-5 years for mild MS
Additional terms
References
- ↑ Manual of Medical Therapeutics, 28th ed, Ewald & McKenzie (eds), Little, Brown & Co, Boston, 1995, pg 125-26
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 42-44, 785-86
- ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018.
Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 19 Board Basics. An Enhancement to MKSAP19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2022 - ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Doukas G et al Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation. A randomized control study. JAMA 294:2323, 2005 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16278360
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Sundt TM and Gersh BJ Making sense of the maze: Which patients with atrial fibrillation will benefit? JAMA 294:2357, 2005 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16278365
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Wilson W et al, Prevention of infective endocardititis: guidelines from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease Committe, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. J AM Dent Assoc 2008, 139:3S
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 7th edition Parada JT et al (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- ↑ Chandrashekhar Y, Westaby S, Narula J. Mitral stenosis. Lancet. 2009 Oct 10;374(9697):1271-83. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19747723
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. March 15, 2017 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298458 <Internet> http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/2017/03/14/CIR.0000000000000503
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Imran TF, Awtry EH. (video) Severe Mitral Stenosis. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:e6. July 19, 2018 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30021094 Free full text https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMicm1715321
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 NEJM Knowledge+