ECG exercise tolerance testing (ETT)
Introduction
Also referred to as a stress test, a diagnostic test in which the patient exercises on a treadmill, bicycle, or other equipment while heart activity is monitored by an ECG.
Indications
- initial diagnostic study for coronary artery disease (CAD) in most patients*
- evaluation of chest pain (typical or atypical for angina)
- latent CAD
- evaluation of severity & prognosis of CAD
- evaluation of functional capacity
- evaluation of therapy (medical &/or surgical)
- evaluation of arrhythmia
- arrhythmias that occur spontaneously with exercise
- most arrhythmias are not exercise related[2]
- peak heart rate in a patient with an implantable defibrillator
- ventricular response in patients with atrial fibrillation
- response of rate-responsive pacemaker during exercise
- arrhythmias that occur spontaneously with exercise
- post MI predischarge evaluation
- evaluation of hypoxemia or oxygen desaturation[3]
* high sensitivity for left main, 3-vessel & severe 2-vessel coronary artery disease
Contraindications
- absolute
- acute myocardial infarction (<10 days)
- uncontrolled, unstable angina
- decompensated congestive heart failure
- active myocarditis or pericarditis
- uncontrolled major arrhythmia
- excessive hypertension (systolic BP > 200 mm Hg)
- marked postural hypotension (systolic BP drop > 20 mm Hg)
- critical aortic stenosis
- severe aortic stenosis with worsening symptoms[9]
- other major acute illness
- relative: (renders test uninterpretable)
- left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)
- atrial fibrillation
- digoxin
- left bundle branch block (LBBB)
- mitral valve prolapse
- T-wave abnormalities
- ST segment abnormalities (> 0.5 mm ST segment depression)[2]
- paced rhythm
- WPW syndrome
- prior revascularization
- routine screening of asymptomatic patients[6]
Advantages
- provides data on
- exercise capacity
- blood pressure & heart rate response to exercise
- possibly, provoked symptoms
Disadvantages
- not useful when baseline ECG is abnormal#
- accuracy depends on pretest probability of disease
- abnormalities predict increased risk, but with uncertain implications regarding treatment[6]
- ischemia on exercise stress testing does not predict cardiovascular events or change in LV ejection fraction in patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease[11]
# see Contraindications
Procedure
- Bruce protocol
- Naughton protocol
- Blake protocol
- Ellestad protocol
Discontinue beta-blocker 24-48 hours prior to testing[2]
The extremity electrodes are moved to the torso to reduce motion artifact. The arm electrodes are placed in the lateral aspect of the infraclavicular fossa & the leg electrodes are placed above the iliac crest & the rib cage. This results in a right axis shift & increased voltage in inferior leads. It may result in a loss of inferior Q waves &/or development of a new Q wave in aVL.
Reasons for terminating a stress test
- fatigue or dyspnea on exertion
- maximum heart rate
- angina (3 out of 4)
- progressive ST segment depression
- arrhythmia
- ventricular tachycardia (a run of 3 or more PVCs)
- rapid supraventricular arrhythmia
- heart block
- blood pressure (BP) abnormalities
- progressive drop in BP with increasing workload (> 20 mm Hg)
- anxious normal individuals may drop BP during stage I
- excessive elevation of systolic BP (> 250 mm Hg)
- signs of hypoperfusion
- lightheadedness
- pale color
- clammy skin
- intermittent claudication
- musculoskeletal limitations or balance difficulties
- other reasons
Criteria for positive ECG response
- normal resting ST segment
- > 1 mm ST segment depression in 2 contiguous ECG leads[2]
- 1 mm J point depression with horizontal or downsloping ST segment
- 1.5 mm ST depression at 80 msec after the J point with upsloping ST segment
- abnormal resting ST segment
- 2 mm of additional ST segment depression
- patient on digitalis
- same criteria as normal resting ST segment if patient achieves > 90% maximum predicted heart rate
* 1 mm horizontal ST segment depression that resolves in the 1st minute of recovery does not meet criteria for further testing, but does suggest a component ischemic heart disease[9]
- cardiac rehabilitation is recommended vs myocardial perfusion testing (pharmacologic testing) or cardiac catheterization
- normal response of systolic blood pressure to increasing workloads is 160-200 mm Hg
- also see hypertensive response to exercise
- in normal subjects, diastolic blood pressure does not change significantly
- failure to increase systolic blood pressure to > 120 mm Hg or sustained decreased in systolic blood pressure > 10 mm Hg below standing resting values is abnormal
- myocardial ischemia
- cardiomyopathy
- cardiac arrhythmias
- vasovagal reactions
- left ventricular outflow obstruction
- ingestion of antihypertensive drugs
- hypovolemia
- prolonged vigorous exercise
Other prognostic/diagnostic factors:
- achievement of a high workload (good prognosis)
- typical angina during exercise
- adds diagnostic & prognostic information
- occurring at < 6 METS (before the end of stage 2 of the Bruce protocol) is an indication for coronary angiography
- persistence of ST segment depression into recovery
- increased heart rate of > 12/min during 1st minute of exercise is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction[3]
- self-reported dyspnea is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction[4]
- high-grade premature ventricular contractions during the recovery period following exercise may be associated with increased cardiovascular risk[12]
- higher incidence of false-positive ST segment depression in women*[2]
- sensitivity is also lower in women*
* recommendations are generally the same for men & women[2]
Management
- a positive test warrants referral for myocardial perfusion test or cardiac catheterization
- stress echocardiography if baseline ST segment abnormalities (> 0.5 mm ST segment depression) confound interpretation[2]
- if the exercise stress test is inadequate, a pharmacologic stress test should be performed[2]
- symptomatic patients with an abnormal test that does not meet criteria for a positive test may benefit from cardiac rehabilitation[9]
- Duke treadmill score may provide useful risk information[2]
Notes
- rapid resolution of ECG changes during exercise portends negative followup testing & good prognoses[7]
- angina pectoris despite negative ECG findings portends positive followup testing & poorer prognosis
- chest tightness & breathlessness in a man with history of myocardial infarction in the absence of ECG changes constitutes low risk[2]
- younger age, female sex, & achieving a higher level of exercise portend negative followup testing[7]
More general terms
More specific terms
- Bruce protocol
- Ellestad protocol
- Naughton protocol
- post-MI exercise testing; rehabilitation treadmill testing; predischarge exercise testing
Additional terms
References
- ↑ Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 86
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Falcone C, Buzzi MP, Klersy C, Schwartz PJ. Rapid heart rate increase at onset of exercise predicts adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2005 Sep 27;112(13):1959-64. Epub 2005 Sep 19. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16172270
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Abidov A et al. Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing. N Engl J Med 2005 Nov 3; 353:1889-98
- ↑ UpToDate 14.1 http://www.utdol.com
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Chou R et al Screening Asymptomatic Adults With Resting or Exercise Electrocardiography: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Annals of Internal Medicine 2011, 155(6):375-385 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21930855 <Internet> http://www.annals.org/content/155/6/375.abstract
Lauer MS What Now With Screening Electrocardiography? Annals of Internal Medicine 2011, 155(6):395-397 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21930859 <Internet> http://www.annals.org/content/155/6/395.extract
US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Coronary Heart Disease Release Date: February 2004 http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsacad.htm - ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Christman MP et al. The yield of downstream tests after ETT: A prospective cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 Feb 5 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24509269 <Internet> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109714002897
Sinusas AJ and Spatz ES. Reframing the interpretation and application of exercise electrocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 Feb 5; <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24509274 <Internet> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109714002800 - ↑ Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jun;106(6):793-800 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3579066
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 9th edition (GRS9) Medinal-Walpole A, Pacala JT, Porter JF (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2016
Geriatric Review Syllabus, 11th edition (GRS11) Harper GM, Lyons WL, Potter JF (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2022 - ↑ Mieres JH, Gulati M, Bairey Merz N et al Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected ischemic heart disease: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014 Jul 22;130(4):350-79. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25047587
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Garzillo CL, Hueb W, Gersh B et al. Association between stress testing-induced myocardial ischemia and clinical events in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. JAMA Intern Med 2019 Jul 22 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329221 Free PMC Article https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2738785
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Swift Yasgur B Post-Exercise PVCs Tied to Higher CV Mortality Risk. Medscape. Dec 2, 2021 https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/964055