biological age
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Introduction
- Biological age captures some of the variance in life expectancy for which chronological age is not accountable
- quantifies the heterogeneity in the presentation of the aging phenotype in different individuals.
- in the elderly, biological age may be estimated using the frailty index
- the frailty index outperforms age & Klemera-Doubal's biological age estimates in the elderly, especially among the oldest old at high risk of mortality due to (at least in part) biological aging[1]
- a DNA methylation index, based on 38 CpG sites can predict mortality better than the frailty index based on health, function, & blood chemistry[1]
Etiology
- biological age results from contributions of genetic predispositions & physiological responses to exposure accumulation over a lifespan[1]
- nonlinear patterns occur in molecular markers of aging[5]
- dysregulation occurs at ~44 & ~60 years of chronological age[5]
- cardiovascular disease, lipid & alcohol metabolism changes at the 40-year transition
- immune regulation & carbohydrate metabolism changes at the 60-year transition[5]
- dysregulation occurs at ~44 & ~60 years of chronological age[5]
Methods
- 3 commonly used methods to compute biological age
- a structural equation model
- a structural equation model estimates of biological age differs from those estimates from principal components & multiple regression, but is comparable to Klemera-Doubal's method[2]
- 5 groups of biomarkers
Notes
- Klemera-Doubal's method[4]
- risky lifestyle factors
- risky dietary habits
- 8 physical markers
- height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, FEV1 (8 of 16)
- 9 biochemical markers[4]
More general terms
Additional terms
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Kim S, Fuselier J, Welsh DA et al Feature Selection Algorithms Enhance the Accuracy of Frailty Indexes as Measures of Biological Age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471059 PMCID: PMC8277082 Free PMC article.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Beltran-Sanchez H, Palloni A, Huangfu Y, McEniry MC. Modeling biological age and its link with the aging process. PNAS Nexus. 2022 Jul 26;1(3):pgac135. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36741436 PMCID: PMC9923798 Free PMC article.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Wei K, Peng S, Liu N et al All-Subset Analysis Improves the Predictive Accuracy of Biological Age for All-Cause Mortality in Chinese and U.S. Populations. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Nov 21;77(11):2288-2297. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35417546 PMCID: PMC9923798 Free PMC article.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Chen L, Zhang Y, Yu C et al Modeling biological age using blood biomarkers and physical measurements in Chinese adults. EBioMedicine. 2023 Mar;89:104458. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758480 PMCID: PMC9941058 Free PMC article. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00023-3/fulltext
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Shen X, Wang C, Zhou X, Zhou W, Hornburg D, Wu S, Snyder MP. Nonlinear dynamics of multi-omics profiles during human aging. Nat Aging. 2024 Aug 14. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39143318 https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2