endometrial cancer (carcinoma)

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Etiology

Epidemiology

Pathology

Microscopic pathology

histopathologic types

Genetics

Clinical manifestations

Laboratory

Diagnostic procedures

Radiology

Staging

AJCC/TNM/FIGO

TNM FIGO Assessment
TX - primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 - no evidence of primary tumor
Tis 0 carcinoma in situ
T1 I tumor confined to corpus uteri
T1a IA tumor limited to endometrium
T1b IB tumor invades less than 1/2 of myometrium
T1c IC tumor invades 1/2 or more of myometrium
T2 II tumor invades cervix , does not extend beyond uterus
T2a IIA tumor limited to glandular epithelium of endocervix. No evidence of connective tissue stromal invasion.
T2b IIB invasion of stromal connective tissue of cervix
T3 III local &/or regional spread
T3a IIIA tumor involves serosa &/or adnexa (direct extension or metastasis) &/or cancer cells in ascites or peritoneal washings
T3b IIIB vaginal involvement (direct extension or metastasis)
T4 IVA tumor invades bladder mucosa &/or bowel mucosa
NX - regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0 - no regional lymph node metastasis
N1 IIIC regional lymph node metastasis to pelvic &/or para-aortic nodes
MX - distal metastases cannot be assessed
M0 - no distant metastasis
M1 IVB distant metastasis (includes abdominal lymph nodes other than para-aortic &/or inguinal lymph nodes; excludes metastasis to vagina, pelvic serosa or adnexa)
stage T N M
stage 0 Tis N0 M0
stage I T1 N0 M0
stage IA T1a N0 M0
stage IB T1b N0 M0
stage IC T1c N0 M0
stage II T2 N0 M0
stage IIA T2a N0 M0
stage IIB T2b N0 M0
stage III T3 N0 M0
stage IIIA T3a N0 M0
stage IIIB T3b N0 M0
stage IIIC T1 N1 M0
- T2 N1 M0
- T3 N1 M0
stage IVA T4 N_ M0
stage IVB T_ N_ M1

Histologic grading:

GX: grade cannot be assessed

G1: well differentiated

G2: moderately differentiated

G3-4: poorly differentiated or undifferentiated

G1: 5% or less of a non-squamous or non-morular solid growth pattern

G2: 6% - 50% of a non-squamous or non-morular solid growth pattern

G3: more than 50% of non-squamous or non-morular solid growth pattern

  • notable nuclear atypia inappropriate for architectural grade raises grade to 3
  • serous, clear cell and mixed mesodermal tumors are high risk & considered grade 3
  • adenocarcinomas with benign squamous elements are graded according to the nuclear grade of the glandular component.
  • stage 1: confined to corpus
  • stage 2: involves corpus & cervix
  • stage 3: extends outside the uterus, but not outside the pelvis
  • stage 4: extends outside the pelvis or involves the bladder or rectum
stage T N M
stage 0 Tis N0 M0
stage I T1 N0 M0
stage IA T1a N0 M0
stage IB T1b N0 M0
stage IC T1c N0 M0
stage II T2 N0 M0
stage IIA T2a N0 M0
stage IIB T2b N0 M0
stage III T3 N0 M0
stage IIIA T3a N0 M0
stage IIIB T3b N0 M0
stage IIIC T1 N1 M0
- T2 N1 M0
- T3 N1 M0
stage IVA T4 N_ M0
stage IVB T_ N_ M1

Histologic grading:

GX: grade cannot be assessed

G1: well differentiated

G2: moderately differentiated

G3-4: poorly differentiated or undifferentiated

G1: 5% or less of a non-squamous or non-morular solid growth pattern

G2: 6% - 50% of a non-squamous or non-morular solid growth pattern

G3: more than 50% of non-squamous or non-morular solid growth pattern

  • notable nuclear atypia inappropriate for architectural grade raises grade to 3
  • serous, clear cell and mixed mesodermal tumors are high risk & considered grade 3
  • adenocarcinomas with benign squamous elements are graded according to the nuclear grade of the glandular component.
  • stage 1: confined to corpus
  • stage 2: involves corpus & cervix
  • stage 3: extends outside the uterus, but not outside the pelvis
  • stage 4: extends outside the pelvis or involves the bladder or rectum

Complications

Management

More general terms

Additional terms

References

  1. Saunders Manual of Medical Practice, Rakel (ed), WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1996, pg 29-30
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11, 14, 15, 18, 19 American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998, 2006, 2009, 2018, 2022.
    Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 19 Board Basics. An Enhancement to MKSAP19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2022
  3. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 14th ed. Fauci et al (eds), McGraw-Hill Inc. NY, 1998, pg 607-608
  4. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 6th ed. Springer 2002
  5. 5.0 5.1 Jacobs I et al Sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound screening for endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women: a case-control study within the UKCTOCS cohort Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):38-48. Epub 2010 Dec 10. <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147030 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2810%2970268-0/abstract
    Vergote I et al Should we screen for endometrial cancer? The Lancet Oncology, Early Online Publication, 13 December 2010 Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):4-5. Epub 2010 Dec 10. No abstract available. <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147031 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2810%2970280-1/fulltext
  6. 6.0 6.1 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 497, 67-73 (02 May 2013) <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23636398 <Internet> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v497/n7447/full/nature12113.html
  7. 7.0 7.1 Inoue-Choi M et al Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and the Risk of Type I and Type II Endometrial Cancer among Postmenopausal Women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Nov 22, 2013. 1-11 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273064 <Internet> http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2013/11/13/1055-9965.EPI-13-0636.abstract
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Kaunitz AM Do Oral Bisphosphonates Affect Endometrial Cancer Risk? NEJM Journal Watch. March 5 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society (subscription needed) http://www.jwatch.org
    Newcomb PA et al. Oral bisphosphonate use and risk of postmenopausal endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015 Feb 23 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713431 <Internet> http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/33/10/1186
  9. 9.0 9.1 Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies on Endometrial Cancer. Endometrial cancer and oral contraceptives: an individual participant meta-analysis of 27,276 women with endometrial cancer from 36 epidemiological studies. The Lancet Oncology. Aug 5, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254030 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanonc/PIIS1470-2045%2815%2900212-0.pdf
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 9th edition (GRS9) Medinal-Walpole A, Pacala JT, Porter JF (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2016
    Geriatric Review Syllabus, 11th edition (GRS11) Harper GM, Lyons WL, Potter JF (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2022
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Novetsky AP, Kuroki LM, Massad LS et al The utility and management of vaginal cytology after treatment for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):129-35. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262937 Free PMC Article
  12. 12.0 12.1 Barbieri RL Endometrial Cancer and Breast-Feeding: Add Another Benefit to the Inventory. NEJM Journal Watch. May 18, 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society (subscription needed) http://www.jwatch.org
    Jordan SJ, Na R, Johnatty SE et al. Breastfeeding and endometrial cancer risk: An analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. Obstet Gynecol 2017 Jun; 129:1059 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486362
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Bankhead C. Recurrent Endometrial Ca Responds to mTOR Drug. Responses in half of patients with no prior chemotherapy. MedPage Today. March 25, 2018 https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/sgo/71982
    Slomovitz B, et al GOG 3007, a randomized phase II trial of everolimus and letrozole or hormonal therapy (medroxyprogesterone/tamoxifen) in women with advanced, persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A GOG Foundation study. Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2018;Abstract 1.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Hoffmann C with Expert Critique from Reddy AB Pelvic RT Remains Standard of Care for High-Risk, Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer. Recent research finds neither vaginal cuff brachytherapy plus chemotherapy nor adjuvant chemotherapy offers more benefit. MedPage Today. ASCO Reading Room 05.21.2018 https://www.medpagetoday.com/reading-room/asco/gynecological-cancers/73003
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Lu KH, Broaddus RR Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2053-2064, Nov 19. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207095 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1514010
    Rothaus C Endometrial Cancer. NEJM Resident 360. Nov 18, 2020 https://resident360.nejm.org/clinical-pearls/endometrial-cancer
  16. 16.0 16.1 Carter JS Endometrial Carcinoma Guidelines. Medscape. April 4, 2022 https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/254083-guidelines
  17. Endometrial Cancer (PDQ): Prevention http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/prevention/endometrial/HealthProfessional
    Endometrial Cancer (PDQ): Screening http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/endometrial/HealthProfessional
    Endometrial Cancer (PDQ): Treatment http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/endometrial/HealthProfessional

Patient information

endometrial cancer patient information

Database