Fosamax Actonel Comparison Trial
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Introduction
Comparison:
- once-weekly alendronate 70 mg compared with
- once-weekly risedronate 35 mg in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis
Design:
- randomized, double-blind trial conducted at 78 sites in the USA
- postmenopausal women
- 40 years of age or older
- over 25 years of age if surgically menopausal
- low bone density*
- 1,042 patients
* defined as a BMD of >= -2.0 SD below young adult mean BMD in at least one site (total hip, hip trochanter, femoral neck, or PA lumbar spine)
Exclusion criteria:
- history of esophageal abnormalities
- those unable to remain upright for at least 30 minutes after dosing
- low concentrations of vitamin D
- metabolic bone disease
- use of systemic estrogen, estrogen analogues, tibolone, or anabolic steroids within the past 6 months
- use of bisphosphonates or parathyroid hormone within the past 12 months
- daily prednisone 7.5 mg > 1 month in the last 6 months
- use of immunosupressants
Patients were treated for 12 months*
- both the patient & investigators were blinded
* an additional 12 months where only the patients were blinded (not yet been reported)
Outcomes:
- BMD at the hip trochanter dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at 0 6, & 12 months
- other BMD assessments included posterior-anterior (PA) lumbar spine proximal femur
- urinary N-telopeptide of type I human collagen
- serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase
- serum N terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen
Results:
- alendronate increased bone density of the hip by 3.4% in one year compared with 2.1% for risedronate
- differences also favored alendronate at lumbar spine
- reduction in bone turnover (all biochemical markers) greater with alendronate than risedronate at 3-12 months
- adverse effects was similar in the 2 groups
- upper GI effects in 20-22%
More general terms
References
- ↑ Prescriber's Letter 11(12): 2004 Once-Weekly Alendronate Compared with Once-Weekly Risedronate Detail-Document#: http://prescribersletter.com/(5bhgn1a4ni4cyp2tvybwfh55)/pl/ArticleDD.aspx?li=1&st=1&cs=&s=PRL&pt=3&fpt=25&dd=201203&pb=PRL (subscription needed) http://www.prescribersletter.com