cryptogenic stroke; embolic stroke of undetermined source

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Etiology

* cryptogenic cases were less likely to have hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or a smoking history than ischemic strokes where the cause is identifiable[1]

Epidemiology

Laboratory

Diagnostic procedures

Complications

Management

* presence of patent foramen ovale does not alter therapy[2]

* incidence of recurrent cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent forament ovale is low, but reportedly diminished 50% with Amplatzer PFO occlusion device[6]

More general terms

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Li L, Yiin GS, Geraghty OC et al Incidence, outcome, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of cryptogenic transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: a population-based study. Lancet Neurology. July 27, 2015 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227434 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422%2815%2900132-5/fulltext
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 17, 19 American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2015, 2021
  3. 3.0 3.1 Chen L, Luo S, Yan L, Zhao W A systematic review of closure versus medical therapy for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Feb 15;337(1-2):3-7 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300230
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Saver JL. CLINICAL PRACTICE. Cryptogenic Stroke. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 26;374(21):2065-74. <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27223148 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcp1503946
  5. 5.0 5.1 Coutinho JM, Derkatch S, Potvin AR et al Nonstenotic carotid plaque on CT angiography in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Neurology. 2016 Aug 16;87(7):665-72. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27412144
  6. 6.0 6.1 FDA News Release. October 28, 2016 FDA approves new device for prevention of recurrent strokes in certain patients. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm527096.htm
  7. 7.0 7.1 Phend C PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke Prevents Recurrences - First overall stroke reduction with closure reported in two trials. MedPage Today. May 16, 2017 https://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Strokes/65348
    Mi MY, Block PC, Broderick JP PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke N Engl J Med 2018; 378:1639-1642 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29694824 <Internet> http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMclde1715853
  8. 8.0 8.1 Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H et al Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:2191-2201 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766772 https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1802686
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Kuijpers T, Spencer FA, Siemieniuk RAC et al Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy alone for management of cryptogenic stroke? A clinical practice guideline. BMJ 2018;362:k2515 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045912 https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k2515
  10. 10.0 10.1 Emery G Pradaxa Fails to Prevent Recurrence After Cryptogenic Stroke, Medscape - May 15, 2019. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/913077
  11. 11.0 11.1 Triantafyllou S et al. Implantable cardiac monitoring in the secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke. Ann Neurol 2020 Aug 22; PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32827232 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ana.25886
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Perera KS et al. Evaluating rates of recurrent ischemic stroke among young adults with embolic stroke of undetermined source: The Young ESUS longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Neurol 2022 May; 79:450-458 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285869 PMCID: PMC8922202 (available on 2023-03-14) https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2790077