basic activities of daily living (bADL, Katz)

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

Basic daily activities such as eating, grooming, toileting, bathing, ambulating & dressing.

The ADL score[3][4] is an index of independence based on:

1 point for each; maximum of 6 points.

Functions assessed: basic self care

Range or sensitivity:

  • limited to basic activities
  • not sensitive to small changes

Administration:

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • limited range of activities assessed
  • ratings subjective

Procedure

(evaluation)

  • bathing
    • 1: receives no assistance* or receives assistance in bathing only 1 part of the body
    • 0: needs assistance bathing
  • dressing
    • 1: gets clothes & fasteners & gets completely dressed without assistance (exception is for assistance tying shoes)
    • 0: needs assistance dressing
  • toileting
    • 1: uses toilet, cleans self, arranges clothes without assistance (may use object for support such as cane, walker, wheel chair & may manage night time commode or bedpan, emptying same morning)
    • 0: needs assistance toileting, cleansing, arranging clothes or managing night time commode or bedpan
  • transfers
    • 1: moves in & out of bed & chair without assistance (may use object for support, i.e. cane or walker)
    • 0: needs assistance moving in &/or out of bed or chair
  • continence
  • feeding
    • 1: feeds self without assistance (exception is cutting meat or buttering bread)
    • 0: needs/receives assistance eating

* assistance means supervision, direction or direct assistance

Management

(tools for activities of daily living)

Allowing demented patients to participate in their ADL, accompanied by functionally-based exercises, performed during ADL, diminishes rate in decline of ADL[5]

More general terms

Additional terms

References

  1. nlmpubs.nlm.nih.gov/hstat/ahcpr/
  2. Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 390, 408
  3. 3.0 3.1 Sepulveda VA GRECC assessment guidelines
  4. 4.0 4.1 Katz et al, The Gerontologist, 10:20-30, Spring 1970, part I
  5. 5.0 5.1 Geriatrics Review Syllabus, American Geriatrics Society, 5th edition, 2002-2004
  6. Brummel-Smith K In Cassel C 2003