upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Etiology
- primary (30%)
- idiopathic
- associated with thoracic outlet syndrome[3] (60% of primary UEDVT)
- secondary
- indwelling catheter-related (45%)[1][3] larger catheter confers higher risk
- 10% of patients with pacemakers[3]
- malignancy confers 8-fold increased risk[3]
- hypercoagulable state[3]
- obesity NOT risk factor
- hormone replacement therapy NOT risk factor
Epidemiology
Pathology
- not benign[1]
- more likely to have cancer than patients with lower extremity DVT (38% vs 20%)
- less likely to present with acute pulmonary embolism than patients with lower extremity DVT (9% vs 29%)
Diagnostic criteria
- an algorithm is proprosed[4], consisting of
- clinical decision score
- presence of a central venous catheter or lead
- localized pain
- unilateral edema
- lack of an alternative diagnosis
- d-dimer testing
- ultrasonography
- clinical decision score
Laboratory
Radiology
- non-invasive tests
- ultrasound
- criteria is failure of venous lumen to fully collapse under gentle pressure from ultrasound transducer/probe
- 82% sensitivity & specificity vs venography[2] for upper extremity DVT
- ultrasound
Complications
- pulmonary emboli (~30%)
- postphlebitic syndrome less common than in patients with lower extremity DVT
Management
- treatment not standardized[3]
- anticoagulation: generally 3 months with target INR of 2.0-3.0
- see deep vein thrombosis
- if catheter associated thrombosis, anticoagulation as long as the catheter remains in place[5]
- prognosis:
- recurrence lower than that for lower extremity DVT
- patients without catheters & without cancer with have lowest incidence of recurrence (0.5%)[1]
More general terms
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Munoz FJ et al, Clinical outcome of patients with upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: results from the RIETE Registry. Chest 2008, 133:143 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17925416
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Journal Watch 22(5):36, 2002 Fraser DG et al, Diagnosis of lower-limb deep vein thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 136:89, 2002 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11790060
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Flinterman LE et al. Current perspective of venous thrombosis in the upper extremity. J Thromb Haemost 2008 Aug; 6:1262. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18485082
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Kleinjan A et al. Safety and feasibility of a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability, d-dimer testing, and ultrasonography for suspected upper extremity deep venous thrombosis: A prospective management study. Ann Intern Med 2014 Apr 1; 160:451 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24687068 <Internet> http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1852866
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 17, 18, 19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2015, 2018, 2022.