Marcus Gunn pupil (afferent pupillary defect)

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

Afferent pupillary defect.

Etiology

* afferent pupillary response uses subcortical pathway, thus occipital lobe lesion not an etiology

Physical examination

* paradoxical dilation of the pupils when the swinging light is shifted from the unaffected eye to the affected eye[3]

Clinical manifestations

  • failure of pupil to constrict appropriately with increasing light

Diagnostic procedures

Radiology

Differential diagnosis

* degeneration of afferent of efferent midbrain synapses may yield a similar picture

More general terms

Additional terms

References

  1. Stedman's Medical Dictionary 27th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1999
  2. Ferri's Clinical Advisor, Instant Diagnosis and Treatment, Ferri FF (ed), Mosby, Philadelphia, 2003, pg 1215
  3. 3.0 3.1 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 11, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 1998
    Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 19 Board Basics. An Enhancement to MKSAP19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2022
  4. Wikipedia: Marcus Gunn pupil http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Gunn_pupil
  5. Ichhpujani P, Rome JE, Jindal A et al Comparative study of 3 techniques to detect a relative afferent pupillary defect. J Glaucoma. 2011 Dec;20(9):535-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20852433
  6. Volpe NJ, Dadvand L, Kim SK et al Computerized binocular pupillography of the swinging flashlight test detects afferent pupillary defects. Curr Eye Res. 2009 Jul;34(7):606-13. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19899974
  7. Younis AA, Eggenberger ER. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and retinal nerve fiber layer loss in unilateral or asymmetric demyelinating optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Aug;51(8):4013-6 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20207978
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Geriatric Review Syllabus, 8th edition (GRS8) Durso SC and Sullivan GN (eds) American Geriatrics Society, 2013
  9. Lee AG, Chau FY, Golnik KC, Kardon RH, Wall M The diagnostic yield of the evaluation for isolated unexplained optic atrophy. Ophthalmology 2005 May 10; 112:757 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15878053
  10. Lawlor M, Quartilho A, Bunce C et al. Patients with normal tension glaucoma have relative sparing of the relative afferent pupillary defect compared to those with open angle glaucoma and elevated intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(12):5237-5241 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049724 Free article https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2657596
  11. Schmidt F, Connolly F, Maas MB et al. Objective assessment of a relative afferent pupillary defect by B-mode ultrasound. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202774 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30148895 PMCID: PMC6110480 Free PMC article https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202774