cervical artery dissection

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Classification

Etiology

Clinical manifestations

Complications

  • elderly >= 60 years of age associated with less favorable outcomes[3]

Management

More specific terms

References

  1. The CADISS trial investigators. Antiplatelet treatment compared with anticoagulation treatment for cervical artery dissection (CADISS): A randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2015 Feb 12 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25684164 <Internet> http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422%2815%2970018-9/abstract
  2. Kennedy F, Lanfranconi S, Hicks C et al Antiplatelets vs anticoagulation for dissection: CADISS nonrandomized arm and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2012 Aug 14;79(7):686-9. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22855862
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Traenka C, Dougoud D, Simonetti BG et al. Cervical artery dissection in patients >= 60 years: Often painless, few mechanical triggers. Neurology 2017 Apr 4; 88:1313 <PubMed> PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28258079 <Internet> http://www.neurology.org/content/88/14/1313
  4. 4.0 4.1 Engelter ST et al. Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): An open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol 2021 Mar 22; [e-pub]. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765420 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(21)00044-2/fulltext