staging of breast cancer

From Aaushi
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Indications

Clinical significance

Primary tumor (T)

T stage tumor
TIS carcinoma in situ
T1 T =< 2 cm
T2 T 2.1-5 cm
T3 T > 5 cm
T4 T of any size with direct extension to the chest wall or skin

Regional nodes (N)#

N stage Nodes
N0 No involved nodes
N1 Moveable ipsilateral axillary nodes
N2 Matted or fixed nodes

Distant metastases (M)

M stage   Metastases
 M0       None detected
 M1       Distant metastasis* present (includes ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes)

Stage grouping:

Stage TN designation assessment
Stage 1 T1 N0 operable disease
Stage 2A T1 N1 operable disease
Stage 2A T2 N0 operable disease
Stage 2B T2 N1 operable disease
Stage 2B T3 N0 operable disease
Stage 3A T1 N2 locally advanced disease
Stage 3A T2 N2 locally advanced disease
Stage 3A T3 N1, N2 locally advanced disease
Stage 3B T4, any N locally advanced disease
Stage 4 any T, any N, M1 advanced or metastatic disease

Prognosis: (5 year survival)

  • Stage 1: 99%
  • Stage 2: 92%
  • Stage 2a: 82%
  • Stage 2b: 65%
  • Stage 3a: 47%
  • Stage 3b: 44%
  • Stage 4: 14%
M stage   Metastases
 M0       None detected
 M1       Distant metastasis* present (includes ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes)

Stage grouping:

Stage TN designation assessment
Stage 1 T1 N0 operable disease
Stage 2A T1 N1 operable disease
Stage 2A T2 N0 operable disease
Stage 2B T2 N1 operable disease
Stage 2B T3 N0 operable disease
Stage 3A T1 N2 locally advanced disease
Stage 3A T2 N2 locally advanced disease
Stage 3A T3 N1, N2 locally advanced disease
Stage 3B T4, any N locally advanced disease
Stage 4 any T, any N, M1 advanced or metastatic disease

Prognosis: (5 year survival)

  • Stage 1: 99%
  • Stage 2: 92%
  • Stage 2a: 82%
  • Stage 2b: 65%
  • Stage 3a: 47%
  • Stage 3b: 44%
  • Stage 4: 14%

Radiology

Notes

More general terms

Additional terms

References

  1. Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review, 1998-99, Prakash UBS (ed) Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, pg 667
  2. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 14th ed. Fauci et al (eds), McGraw-Hill Inc. NY, 1998, pg 563-64
  3. 3.0 3.1 Braun S, Vogl FD, Naume B, Janni W, Osborne MP, Coombes RC, Schlimok G, Diel IJ, Gerber B, Gebauer G, Pierga JY, Marth C, Oruzio D, Wiedswang G, Solomayer EF, Kundt G, Strobl B, Fehm T, Wong GY, Bliss J, Vincent-Salomon A, Pantel K. A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 25;353(8):793-802. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16120859
  4. 4.0 4.1 Mansel RE et al, Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: The ALMANAC trial J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:599 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16670385
  5. 5.0 5.1 Kuznar W with comment by Klil-Drori AJ 8th AJCC Breast Cancer Staging System Incorporates Tumor Biology. Newest update called more clinically relevant. MedPage Today. ASCO Reading Room 05.01.2018 https://www.medpagetoday.com/reading-room/asco/breast-cancer/72618
    Chavez-MacGregor M, Mittendorf EA, Clarke CA et al Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Breast Cancer Staging System. Oncologist. 2017 Nov;22(11):1292-1300. Epub 2017 Jun 7. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592619
  6. 6.0 6.1 Medical Knowledge Self Assessment Program (MKSAP) 19. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia 2021