guidelines for advance directive discussion
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Introduction
opening statement
Many elderly people think about serious illnesses in the future, & wish to discuss in advance the kind of health care they want if they lose the ability to make decisions for themselves. Can we discuss some of these issues today?
goals
- provision of intervention & outcome information
- clarification of patient values
- setting goals for care in case of future incapacity
- comfort vs. life prolongation for terminal illness
- when would patient want comfort measures only?
- specific intervention preferences
- CPR
- hospitalization
- ventilator (acute vs. chronic)
- hospitalization
- tube feeding
- IV
- transfusions
- antibiotics
- the main goal is not to 'get code status'
- naming of proxy decision maker
factors to consider in advance care planning
- quality of life prior to an intervention
- the intervention itself
- prognosis
- cost
- burden
- quality of life after the intervention
- other common patient considerations
- family burden & costs
- 'dignity'
- attitudes toward responsibility to the young
- 'deciding not to decide' - prefers others to decide
- concerns about the way death occurs vs. death itself
assessment of competency to complete advance directives
see Hopkins Competency Assessment Test
Additional terms
References
- ↑ Sepulveda GRECC guidelines (Ken Rosenfeld, MD)