Incremental Decrease in Endpoints through Aggressive Lipid-lowering (IDEAL) trial
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Introduction
Prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation. ,
Study characteristics:
- 8888 patients, with history of myocardial infarction
- < 80 years of age, mean age 62 years, 81% men
- 190 centers in northern Europe 1999-2005.
- study funded by the manufacturer of atorvastatin Treatment
- atorvastatin 80 mg/day vs simvastatin 20 mg/day
Results:
- mean LDL decreases by 49% to 81 mg/dL in atorvastatin group & 33% to 104 mg/dL in simvastatin group
- composite endpoint (sudden death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest with resuscitation) did not differ betweem groups 9.3% (atorvastatin) vs 10.4% (simvastatin)
- incidence of composite primary endpoint plus stroke lower in atorvastatin group 12% vs 14%.
- adverse effects significantly more common with atorvastatin 9.6% vs 4.2%; discontinuation greater with atorvastatin
- serious myopathy or rhabdomyolysis rare in both groups
- death higher simvastatin group 8.4% vs 8.2%
More general terms
References
- ↑ Pedersen TR et al, the Incremental Decrease in Endpoints through Aggressive Lipid-lowering (IDEAL) Study Group High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. The IDEAL study. A randomized controlled trial JAMA 294:2437, 2005 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16287954
Cannon CP The IDEAL cholesterol. Lower is better JAMA 294:2492, 2005 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16287961 - ↑ Prescriber's Letter 13(1): 2006 Detail-Document#: http://prescribersletter.com/(5bhgn1a4ni4cyp2tvybwfh55)/pl/ArticleDD.aspx?li=1&st=1&cs=&s=PRL&pt=3&fpt=25&dd=220104&pb=PRL (subscription needed) http://www.prescribersletter.com