hemiarthroplasty of knee; compartmental arthroplasty of knee
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Advantages
*
- shorter hospital stays
- greater range of motion
- fewer short-term complications[1][2]
Disadvantages
- higher risk for revision
- similar rates of revision[2]
* compared with total knee arthroplasty[1]
Notes
More general terms
Additional terms
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wilson HA, Middleton R, Abram SGF et al. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019;364:l352 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30792179 Free PMC Article https://www.bmj.com/content/364/bmj.l352
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Beard DJ, Davies LJ, Cook JA et al The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. July 17, 2019 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31326135 Free Article https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)31281-4/fulltext
Evans JT, Whitehouse MR. Partial versus total knee replacement for knee osteoarthritis. Lancet. July 17, 2019 PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31326136 Free Article https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)31612-5/fulltext